ASRock Arc A770 Challenger OC 16 GB vs ZOTAC RTX 3050 Solo

Comparison of ASRock Arc A770 Challenger OC 16 GB with 16 GB GDDR6 and 4,096 cores vs ZOTAC RTX 3050 Solo with 8 GB GDDR6 and 2,560 cores.

Loading...

Performance Rating

ASRock Arc A770 Challenger OC 16 GB outperforms ZOTAC RTX 3050 Solo by 118.1% in the overall GPU ARK performance rating

A100 A100
H200 H200
MI325X MI325X

ASRock Arc A770 Challenger OC 16 GB

11.7

ASRock Arc A770 Challenger OC 16 GB

11.7
RX 7900 XTX RX 7900 XTX
MI250 MI250
Instinct MI300X Instinct MI300X

ZOTAC RTX 3050 Solo

5.4

ZOTAC RTX 3050 Solo

5.4

Contents:

Memory ML Performance Compute Power Architecture & Compatibility ML Software Support Clocks & Performance Power Consumption Rendering Additional

Memory

Memory Size

🔥 +100% 16 ГБ
8 GB

Memory Type

GDDR6 GDDR6

Memory Bandwidth

559.9 GB/s 224.0 GB/s

Memory Bus Width

256 бит 128 бит

ML Performance

FP16 (Half Precision)

🔥 +332% 39.32 TFLOPS
9.098 TFLOPS

BF16 (Brain Float)

No No

TF32 (TensorFloat)

No No

Compute Power

FP32 (Single Precision)

🔥 +116% 19.66 TFLOPS
9.098 TFLOPS

FP64 (Double Precision)

🔥 +1,629% 2.458 TFLOPS
0.1422 TFLOPS

CUDA Cores

🔥 +60% 4,096
2,560

RT Cores

🔥 +60% 32
20

Architecture & Compatibility

GPU Architecture

Xe-HPG Ampere

SM (Streaming Multiprocessor)

No
🔥 20

PCIe Version

PCIe 4.0 x16 PCIe 4.0 x8

ML Software Support

CUDA Version

No 8.6

Clocks & Performance

Base Clock

🔥 +39% 2,150
1,552

Boost Clock

🔥 +35% 2,400
1,777

Memory Clock

🔥 +25% 2,187
1,750

Power Consumption

Recommended PSU

550 W
🔥 -45% 300 W

Power Connector

2x 8-pin 1x 8-pin

TDP/TGP

225 W
🔥 -42% 130 W

Rendering

Texture Units (TMU)

🔥 +220% 256
80

ROP

🔥 +60% 32
20

L2 Cache

16 MB
🔥 2 MB

Additional

Slots

Dual-slot Dual-slot

Release Date

Oct. 12, 2022 Jan. 4, 2022

Display Outputs

1x HDMI 2.1
3x DisplayPort 2.0
1x HDMI 2.1
3x DisplayPort 1.4a

Renting is cheaper than buying