ASRock Arc A770 Challenger OC 16 GB vs ZOTAC GTX 295

Comparison of ASRock Arc A770 Challenger OC 16 GB with 16 GB GDDR6 and 4,096 cores vs ZOTAC GTX 295 with 896 GB GDDR3 and 240 cores.

Loading...

Performance Rating

ASRock Arc A770 Challenger OC 16 GB outperforms ZOTAC GTX 295 by 358.43% in the overall GPU ARK performance rating

A100 A100
H200 H200
MI325X MI325X

ASRock Arc A770 Challenger OC 16 GB

11.7

ASRock Arc A770 Challenger OC 16 GB

11.7
RX 7900 XTX RX 7900 XTX
MI250 MI250
Instinct MI300X Instinct MI300X

ZOTAC GTX 295

2.6

ZOTAC GTX 295

2.6

Contents:

Memory ML Performance Compute Power Architecture & Compatibility ML Software Support Clocks & Performance Power Consumption Rendering Additional

Memory

Memory Size

🔥 16 ГБ
896 MB ×2 (1792 ГБ)

Memory Type

GDDR6 GDDR3

Memory Bandwidth

559.9 GB/s 111.9 GB/s ×2 (223.8 GB/s)

Memory Bus Width

256 бит 448 бит ×2 (896 бит)

ML Performance

FP16 (Half Precision)

🔥 39.32 TFLOPS
No

BF16 (Brain Float)

No No

TF32 (TensorFloat)

No No

Compute Power

FP32 (Single Precision)

🔥 +3,198% 19.66 TFLOPS
0.5962 TFLOPS

FP64 (Double Precision)

🔥 +3,199% 2.458 TFLOPS
0.0745 TFLOPS

CUDA Cores

🔥 +1,607% 4,096
240 ×2 (480)

RT Cores

🔥 32
No

Architecture & Compatibility

GPU Architecture

Xe-HPG Tesla 2.0

SM (Streaming Multiprocessor)

No 30

PCIe Version

PCIe 4.0 x16 PCIe 2.0 x16

ML Software Support

CUDA Version

No 1.3

Clocks & Performance

Base Clock

🔥 2,150
No

Boost Clock

🔥 2,400
No

Memory Clock

🔥 +119% 2,187
999

Power Consumption

Recommended PSU

🔥 -8% 550 W
600 W

Power Connector

2x 8-pin 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

TDP/TGP

🔥 -22% 225 W
289 W

Rendering

Texture Units (TMU)

🔥 +220% 256
80 ×2 (160)

ROP

🔥 32
No

L2 Cache

🔥 16 MB
224 KB

Additional

Slots

Dual-slot Dual-slot

Release Date

Oct. 12, 2022 Jan. 8, 2009

Display Outputs

1x HDMI 2.1
3x DisplayPort 2.0
2x DVI
1x HDMI

Renting is cheaper than buying