ASRock Arc A770 Challenger OC 16 GB vs Yeston RX 6400 Low Profile

Comparison of ASRock Arc A770 Challenger OC 16 GB with 16 GB GDDR6 and 4,096 cores vs Yeston RX 6400 Low Profile with 4 GB GDDR6 and 768 cores.

Loading...

Performance Rating

ASRock Arc A770 Challenger OC 16 GB outperforms Yeston RX 6400 Low Profile by 385.06% in the overall GPU ARK performance rating

A100 A100
H200 H200
MI325X MI325X

ASRock Arc A770 Challenger OC 16 GB

11.7

ASRock Arc A770 Challenger OC 16 GB

11.7
RX 7900 XTX RX 7900 XTX
MI250 MI250
Instinct MI300X Instinct MI300X

Yeston RX 6400 Low Profile

2.4

Yeston RX 6400 Low Profile

2.4

Contents:

Memory ML Performance Compute Power Architecture & Compatibility ML Software Support Clocks & Performance Power Consumption Rendering Additional

Memory

Memory Size

🔥 +300% 16 ГБ
4 GB

Memory Type

GDDR6 GDDR6

Memory Bandwidth

559.9 GB/s 128.0 GB/s

Memory Bus Width

256 бит 64 бит

ML Performance

FP16 (Half Precision)

🔥 +451% 39.32 TFLOPS
7.13 TFLOPS

BF16 (Brain Float)

No No

TF32 (TensorFloat)

No No

Compute Power

FP32 (Single Precision)

🔥 +451% 19.66 TFLOPS
3.565 TFLOPS

FP64 (Double Precision)

🔥 +1,003% 2.458 TFLOPS
0.2228 TFLOPS

CUDA Cores

🔥 +433% 4,096
768

RT Cores

🔥 +167% 32
12

Architecture & Compatibility

GPU Architecture

Xe-HPG RDNA 2.0

SM (Streaming Multiprocessor)

No No

PCIe Version

PCIe 4.0 x16 PCIe 4.0 x4

ML Software Support

CUDA Version

No No

Clocks & Performance

Base Clock

🔥 +12% 2,150
1,923

Boost Clock

🔥 +3% 2,400
2,321

Memory Clock

🔥 +9% 2,187
2,000

Power Consumption

Recommended PSU

550 W
🔥 -55% 250 W

Power Connector

2x 8-pin None

TDP/TGP

225 W
🔥 -76% 55 W

Rendering

Texture Units (TMU)

🔥 +433% 256
48

ROP

🔥 +167% 32
12

L2 Cache

🔥 16 MB
1024 KB

Additional

Slots

Dual-slot Single-slot

Release Date

Oct. 12, 2022 Jan. 19, 2022

Display Outputs

1x HDMI 2.1
3x DisplayPort 2.0
1x HDMI 2.1
1x DisplayPort 1.4a

Renting is cheaper than buying