ASRock Arc A770 Challenger OC 16 GB vs Yeston RTX 4070 SAKURA

Comparison of ASRock Arc A770 Challenger OC 16 GB with 16 GB GDDR6 and 4,096 cores vs Yeston RTX 4070 SAKURA with 12 GB GDDR6X and 5,888 cores.

Loading...

Performance Rating

Yeston RTX 4070 SAKURA outperforms ASRock Arc A770 Challenger OC 16 GB by 13.17% in the overall GPU ARK performance rating

A100 A100
H200 H200
MI325X MI325X

ASRock Arc A770 Challenger OC 16 GB

11.7

ASRock Arc A770 Challenger OC 16 GB

11.7
RX 7900 XTX RX 7900 XTX
MI250 MI250
Instinct MI300X Instinct MI300X

Yeston RTX 4070 SAKURA

13.2

Yeston RTX 4070 SAKURA

13.2

Contents:

Memory ML Performance Compute Power Architecture & Compatibility ML Software Support Clocks & Performance Power Consumption Rendering Additional

Memory

Memory Size

🔥 +33% 16 ГБ
12 GB

Memory Type

GDDR6 GDDR6X

Memory Bandwidth

559.9 GB/s 504.2 GB/s

Memory Bus Width

256 бит 192 бит

ML Performance

FP16 (Half Precision)

🔥 +35% 39.32 TFLOPS
29.15 TFLOPS

BF16 (Brain Float)

No No

TF32 (TensorFloat)

No No

Compute Power

FP32 (Single Precision)

19.66 TFLOPS
🔥 +48% 29.15 TFLOPS

FP64 (Double Precision)

🔥 +440% 2.458 TFLOPS
0.4554 TFLOPS

CUDA Cores

4,096
🔥 +44% 5,888

RT Cores

32
🔥 +44% 46

Architecture & Compatibility

GPU Architecture

Xe-HPG Ada Lovelace

SM (Streaming Multiprocessor)

No
🔥 46

PCIe Version

PCIe 4.0 x16 PCIe 4.0 x16

ML Software Support

CUDA Version

No 8.9

Clocks & Performance

Base Clock

🔥 +12% 2,150
1,920

Boost Clock

2,400
🔥 +3% 2,475

Memory Clock

🔥 +67% 2,187
1,313

Power Consumption

Recommended PSU

550 W 550 W

Power Connector

2x 8-pin 1x 16-pin

TDP/TGP

225 W
🔥 -11% 200 W

Rendering

Texture Units (TMU)

🔥 +39% 256
184

ROP

32
🔥 +44% 46

L2 Cache

16 MB
🔥 +125% 36 MB

Additional

Slots

Dual-slot Triple-slot

Release Date

Oct. 12, 2022 April 12, 2023

Display Outputs

1x HDMI 2.1
3x DisplayPort 2.0
1x HDMI 2.1
3x DisplayPort 1.4a

Renting is cheaper than buying