GIGABYTE AORUS RTX 5090 INFINITY vs Yeston R7 350 4 GB

Comparison of GIGABYTE AORUS RTX 5090 INFINITY with 32 GB GDDR7 and 21,760 cores vs Yeston R7 350 4 GB with 4 GB GDDR5 and 512 cores.

Loading...

Performance Rating

GIGABYTE AORUS RTX 5090 INFINITY outperforms Yeston R7 350 4 GB by 4,619.0% in the overall GPU ARK performance rating

A100 A100
H200 H200
MI325X MI325X

GIGABYTE AORUS RTX 5090 INFINITY

47.2

GIGABYTE AORUS RTX 5090 INFINITY

47.2
RX 7900 XTX RX 7900 XTX
MI250 MI250
Instinct MI300X Instinct MI300X

Yeston R7 350 4 GB

1.0

Yeston R7 350 4 GB

1.0

Contents:

Memory ML Performance Compute Power Architecture & Compatibility ML Software Support Clocks & Performance Power Consumption Rendering Additional

Memory

Memory Size

🔥 +700% 32 ГБ
4 GB

Memory Type

GDDR7 GDDR5

Memory Bandwidth

🔥 1.79 TB/s
64.00 GB/s

Memory Bus Width

512 бит 128 бит

ML Performance

FP16 (Half Precision)

🔥 118.8 TFLOPS
No

BF16 (Brain Float)

No No

TF32 (TensorFloat)

No No

Compute Power

FP32 (Single Precision)

🔥 +14,402% 118.8 TFLOPS
0.8192 TFLOPS

FP64 (Double Precision)

🔥 +3,525% 1.856 TFLOPS
0.0512 TFLOPS

CUDA Cores

🔥 +4,150% 21,760
512

RT Cores

🔥 170
No

Architecture & Compatibility

GPU Architecture

Blackwell 2.0 GCN 1.0

SM (Streaming Multiprocessor)

🔥 170
No

PCIe Version

PCIe 5.0 x16 PCIe 3.0 x16

ML Software Support

CUDA Version

12.0 No

Clocks & Performance

Base Clock

🔥 2,017
No

Boost Clock

🔥 2,730
No

Memory Clock

🔥 +75% 1,750
1,000

Power Consumption

Recommended PSU

950 W
🔥 -74% 250 W

Power Connector

1x 16-pin None

TDP/TGP

575 W
🔥 -90% 55 W

Rendering

Texture Units (TMU)

🔥 +2,025% 680
32

ROP

🔥 170
No

L2 Cache

🔥 96 MB
256 KB

Additional

Slots

Triple-slot Dual-slot

Release Date

Jan. 30, 2025 July 6, 2016

Display Outputs

1x HDMI 2.1b
3x DisplayPort 2.1b
1x DVI
1x HDMI 1.4a
1x DisplayPort 1.2

Renting is cheaper than buying