ASRock Arc A770 Challenger OC 16 GB vs XFX Triple D HD 7990

Comparison of ASRock Arc A770 Challenger OC 16 GB with 16 GB GDDR6 and 4,096 cores vs XFX Triple D HD 7990 with 3 GB GDDR5 and 2,048 cores.

Loading...

Performance Rating

ASRock Arc A770 Challenger OC 16 GB outperforms XFX Triple D HD 7990 by 214.25% in the overall GPU ARK performance rating

A100 A100
H200 H200
MI325X MI325X

ASRock Arc A770 Challenger OC 16 GB

11.7

ASRock Arc A770 Challenger OC 16 GB

11.7
RX 7900 XTX RX 7900 XTX
MI250 MI250
Instinct MI300X Instinct MI300X

XFX Triple D HD 7990

3.7

XFX Triple D HD 7990

3.7

Contents:

Memory ML Performance Compute Power Architecture & Compatibility ML Software Support Clocks & Performance Power Consumption Rendering Additional

Memory

Memory Size

🔥 +433% 16 ГБ
3 GB ×2 (6 ГБ)

Memory Type

GDDR6 GDDR5

Memory Bandwidth

559.9 GB/s 288.0 GB/s ×2 (576 GB/s)

Memory Bus Width

256 бит 384 бит ×2 (768 бит)

ML Performance

FP16 (Half Precision)

🔥 39.32 TFLOPS
No

BF16 (Brain Float)

No No

TF32 (TensorFloat)

No No

Compute Power

FP32 (Single Precision)

🔥 +380% 19.66 TFLOPS
4.096 TFLOPS

FP64 (Double Precision)

🔥 +140% 2.458 TFLOPS
1.024 TFLOPS

CUDA Cores

🔥 +100% 4,096
2,048 ×2 (4096)

RT Cores

🔥 32
No

Architecture & Compatibility

GPU Architecture

Xe-HPG GCN 1.0

SM (Streaming Multiprocessor)

No No

PCIe Version

PCIe 4.0 x16 PCIe 3.0 x16

ML Software Support

CUDA Version

No No

Clocks & Performance

Base Clock

🔥 +126% 2,150
950

Boost Clock

🔥 +140% 2,400
1,000

Memory Clock

🔥 +46% 2,187
1,500

Power Consumption

Recommended PSU

🔥 -27% 550 W
750 W

Power Connector

2x 8-pin 2x 8-pin

TDP/TGP

🔥 -40% 225 W
375 W

Rendering

Texture Units (TMU)

🔥 +100% 256
128 ×2 (256)

ROP

🔥 32
No

L2 Cache

🔥 16 MB
768 KB

Additional

Slots

Dual-slot Dual-slot

Release Date

Oct. 12, 2022 April 24, 2013

Display Outputs

1x HDMI 2.1
3x DisplayPort 2.0
1x DVI
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.2

Renting is cheaper than buying