ASRock Arc A770 Challenger OC 16 GB vs XFX RX 550 OC 4 GB

Comparison of ASRock Arc A770 Challenger OC 16 GB with 16 GB GDDR6 and 4,096 cores vs XFX RX 550 OC 4 GB with 4 GB GDDR5 and 512 cores.

Loading...

Performance Rating

ASRock Arc A770 Challenger OC 16 GB outperforms XFX RX 550 OC 4 GB by 735.0% in the overall GPU ARK performance rating

A100 A100
H200 H200
MI325X MI325X

ASRock Arc A770 Challenger OC 16 GB

11.7

ASRock Arc A770 Challenger OC 16 GB

11.7
RX 7900 XTX RX 7900 XTX
MI250 MI250
Instinct MI300X Instinct MI300X

XFX RX 550 OC 4 GB

1.4

XFX RX 550 OC 4 GB

1.4

Contents:

Memory ML Performance Compute Power Architecture & Compatibility ML Software Support Clocks & Performance Power Consumption Rendering Additional

Memory

Memory Size

🔥 +300% 16 ГБ
4 GB

Memory Type

GDDR6 GDDR5

Memory Bandwidth

559.9 GB/s 112.0 GB/s

Memory Bus Width

256 бит 128 бит

ML Performance

FP16 (Half Precision)

🔥 +3,092% 39.32 TFLOPS
1.2319 TFLOPS

BF16 (Brain Float)

No No

TF32 (TensorFloat)

No No

Compute Power

FP32 (Single Precision)

🔥 +1,496% 19.66 TFLOPS
1.2319 TFLOPS

FP64 (Double Precision)

🔥 +3,092% 2.458 TFLOPS
0.077 TFLOPS

CUDA Cores

🔥 +700% 4,096
512

RT Cores

🔥 32
No

Architecture & Compatibility

GPU Architecture

Xe-HPG GCN 4.0

SM (Streaming Multiprocessor)

No No

PCIe Version

PCIe 4.0 x16 PCIe 3.0 x8

ML Software Support

CUDA Version

No No

Clocks & Performance

Base Clock

🔥 +95% 2,150
1,100

Boost Clock

🔥 +100% 2,400
1,203

Memory Clock

🔥 +25% 2,187
1,750

Power Consumption

Recommended PSU

550 W
🔥 -55% 250 W

Power Connector

2x 8-pin None

TDP/TGP

225 W
🔥 -78% 50 W

Rendering

Texture Units (TMU)

🔥 +700% 256
32

ROP

🔥 32
No

L2 Cache

🔥 16 MB
512 KB

Additional

Slots

Dual-slot Dual-slot

Release Date

Oct. 12, 2022 April 20, 2017

Display Outputs

1x HDMI 2.1
3x DisplayPort 2.0
1x DVI
1x HDMI 2.0b
1x DisplayPort 1.4a

Renting is cheaper than buying