ASRock Arc A770 Challenger OC 16 GB vs XFX R9 290

Comparison of ASRock Arc A770 Challenger OC 16 GB with 16 GB GDDR6 and 4,096 cores vs XFX R9 290 with 4 GB GDDR5 and 2,560 cores.

Loading...

Performance Rating

ASRock Arc A770 Challenger OC 16 GB outperforms XFX R9 290 by 177.67% in the overall GPU ARK performance rating

A100 A100
H200 H200
MI325X MI325X

ASRock Arc A770 Challenger OC 16 GB

11.7

ASRock Arc A770 Challenger OC 16 GB

11.7
RX 7900 XTX RX 7900 XTX
MI250 MI250
Instinct MI300X Instinct MI300X

XFX R9 290

4.2

XFX R9 290

4.2

Contents:

Memory ML Performance Compute Power Architecture & Compatibility ML Software Support Clocks & Performance Power Consumption Rendering Additional

Memory

Memory Size

🔥 +300% 16 ГБ
4 GB

Memory Type

GDDR6 GDDR5

Memory Bandwidth

559.9 GB/s 320.0 GB/s

Memory Bus Width

256 бит 512 бит

ML Performance

FP16 (Half Precision)

🔥 39.32 TFLOPS
No

BF16 (Brain Float)

No No

TF32 (TensorFloat)

No No

Compute Power

FP32 (Single Precision)

🔥 +305% 19.66 TFLOPS
4.849 TFLOPS

FP64 (Double Precision)

🔥 +306% 2.458 TFLOPS
0.6061 TFLOPS

CUDA Cores

🔥 +60% 4,096
2,560

RT Cores

🔥 32
No

Architecture & Compatibility

GPU Architecture

Xe-HPG GCN 2.0

SM (Streaming Multiprocessor)

No No

PCIe Version

PCIe 4.0 x16 PCIe 3.0 x16

ML Software Support

CUDA Version

No No

Clocks & Performance

Base Clock

🔥 2,150
No

Boost Clock

🔥 2,400
No

Memory Clock

🔥 +75% 2,187
1,250

Power Consumption

Recommended PSU

🔥 -8% 550 W
600 W

Power Connector

2x 8-pin 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

TDP/TGP

🔥 -18% 225 W
275 W

Rendering

Texture Units (TMU)

🔥 +60% 256
160

ROP

🔥 32
No

L2 Cache

🔥 16 MB
1024 KB

Additional

Slots

Dual-slot Dual-slot

Release Date

Oct. 12, 2022 Nov. 5, 2013

Display Outputs

1x HDMI 2.1
3x DisplayPort 2.0
2x DVI
1x HDMI 1.4a
1x DisplayPort 1.2

Renting is cheaper than buying