AMD Radeon Instinct MI325X vs NVIDIA RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell Embedded

Comparison AMD Radeon Instinct MI325X with 288 GB HBM3e and 19,456 cores vs NVIDIA RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell Embedded with 16 GB GDDR7 and 7,680 cores.

Loading...

Performance Rating

AMD Radeon Instinct MI325X outperforms NVIDIA RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell Embedded by 565.34% in the overall GPU ARK performance rating

A100 A100
H200 H200
MI325X MI325X

AMD Radeon Instinct MI325X

100.0

AMD Radeon Instinct MI325X

100.0
RX 7900 XTX RX 7900 XTX
MI250 MI250
Instinct MI300X Instinct MI300X

NVIDIA RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell Embedded

15.0

NVIDIA RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell Embedded

15.0

Expert Comparison

AMD Radeon Instinct MI325X значительно превосходит NVIDIA RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell Embedded по многим параметрам. MI325X имеет больше ядер (19456 против 7680), большую память (288 ГБ HBM3e против 16 ГБ GDDR7) и гораздо большую пропускную способность (10.3 TB/s против 896.0 GB/s). Также MI325X имеет более высокий индекс производительности (100.0 против 15.0). MI325X лучше подходит для вычислений и больших дата-центров, тогда как RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell Embedded более подходящ для встраиваемых систем с меньшими требованиями к производительности.

Contents:

Memory ML Performance Compute Power Architecture & Compatibility ML Software Support Clocks & Performance Power Consumption Rendering Benchmarks Additional

Memory

Memory Size

🔥 +1,700% 288 ГБ
16 GB

Memory Type

HBM3e GDDR7

Memory Bandwidth

🔥 10.3 TB/s
896.0 GB/s

Memory Bus Width

8,192 бит 256 бит

ML Performance

FP16 (Half Precision)

🔥 +2,401% 653.7 TFLOPS
26.14 TFLOPS

BF16 (Brain Float)

No No

TF32 (TensorFloat)

No No

Compute Power

FP32 (Single Precision)

🔥 +213% 81.72 TFLOPS
26.14 TFLOPS

FP64 (Double Precision)

🔥 +19,905% 81.72 TFLOPS
0.4085 TFLOPS

CUDA Cores

🔥 +153% 19,456
7,680

RT Cores

No 60

Architecture & Compatibility

GPU Architecture

CDNA 3.0 Blackwell 2.0

SM (Streaming Multiprocessor)

No 60

PCIe Version

PCIe 5.0 x16 PCIe 5.0 x16

ML Software Support

CUDA Version

No 12.0

CUDA Toolkit (first supported)

v12

CUDA Toolkit status

Supported Supported

Clocks & Performance

Base Clock

🔥 +3% 1,000
975

Boost Clock

🔥 +23% 2,100
1,702

Memory Clock

🔥 +44% 2,525
1,750

Power Consumption

Recommended PSU

1400 W No

Power Connector

None None

TDP/TGP

1000 W
🔥 -92% 80 W

Rendering

Texture Units (TMU)

🔥 +407% 1,216
240

ROP

No 60

L2 Cache

🔥 16 MB
64 MB

Benchmarks

MLPerf, llama2-70b-99.9 (Dummy)

3 596 tokens/s

MLPerf, llama2-70b-99.9 (fp8)

1 946 tokens/s

llama.cpp, llama-2-7b-Q4_0

22.4 tokens/s

MLPerf, mixtral-8x7b (fp8)

6 975 tokens/s

Additional

Slots

OAM Module IGP

Release Date

Oct. 12, 2024 No

Display Outputs

No outputs
Portable Device Dependent

Renting is cheaper than buying