ASRock Arc A770 Challenger OC 16 GB vs NVIDIA RTX A4500 Embedded

Comparison of ASRock Arc A770 Challenger OC 16 GB with 16 GB GDDR6 and 4,096 cores vs NVIDIA RTX A4500 Embedded with 16 GB GDDR6 and 5,888 cores.

Loading...

Performance Rating

ASRock Arc A770 Challenger OC 16 GB outperforms NVIDIA RTX A4500 Embedded by 28.32% in the overall GPU ARK performance rating

A100 A100
H200 H200
MI325X MI325X

ASRock Arc A770 Challenger OC 16 GB

11.7

ASRock Arc A770 Challenger OC 16 GB

11.7
RX 7900 XTX RX 7900 XTX
MI250 MI250
Instinct MI300X Instinct MI300X

NVIDIA RTX A4500 Embedded

9.1

NVIDIA RTX A4500 Embedded

9.1

Contents:

Memory ML Performance Compute Power Architecture & Compatibility ML Software Support Clocks & Performance Power Consumption Rendering Additional

Memory

Memory Size

16 GB 16 GB

Memory Type

GDDR6 GDDR6

Memory Bandwidth

559.9 GB/s 384.0 GB/s

Memory Bus Width

256 бит 256 бит

ML Performance

FP16 (Half Precision)

🔥 +175% 39.32 TFLOPS
14.31 TFLOPS

BF16 (Brain Float)

No No

TF32 (TensorFloat)

No No

Compute Power

FP32 (Single Precision)

🔥 +37% 19.66 TFLOPS
14.31 TFLOPS

FP64 (Double Precision)

🔥 +999% 2.458 TFLOPS
0.2236 TFLOPS

CUDA Cores

4,096
🔥 +44% 5,888

RT Cores

32
🔥 +44% 46

Architecture & Compatibility

GPU Architecture

Xe-HPG Ampere

SM (Streaming Multiprocessor)

No
🔥 46

PCIe Version

PCIe 4.0 x16 PCIe 4.0 x16

ML Software Support

CUDA Version

No 8.6

Clocks & Performance

Base Clock

🔥 +322% 2,150
510

Boost Clock

🔥 +98% 2,400
1,215

Memory Clock

🔥 +46% 2,187
1,500

Power Consumption

Recommended PSU

550 W No

Power Connector

2x 8-pin None

TDP/TGP

225 W
🔥 -64% 80 W

Rendering

Texture Units (TMU)

🔥 +39% 256
184

ROP

32
🔥 +44% 46

L2 Cache

16 MB
🔥 4 MB

Additional

Slots

Dual-slot MXM Module

Release Date

Oct. 12, 2022 March 30, 2022

Display Outputs

1x HDMI 2.1
3x DisplayPort 2.0
Portable Device Dependent

Renting is cheaper than buying