ASRock Arc A770 Challenger OC 16 GB vs NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 X2 Mobile

Comparison ASRock Arc A770 Challenger OC 16 GB with 16 GB GDDR6 and 4,096 cores vs NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 X2 Mobile with 6 GB GDDR6 and 1,920 cores.

Loading...

Performance Rating

ASRock Arc A770 Challenger OC 16 GB outperforms NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 X2 Mobile by 155.24% in the overall GPU ARK performance rating

A100 A100
H200 H200
MI325X MI325X

ASRock Arc A770 Challenger OC 16 GB

11.7

ASRock Arc A770 Challenger OC 16 GB

11.7
RX 7900 XTX RX 7900 XTX
MI250 MI250
Instinct MI300X Instinct MI300X

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 X2 Mobile

4.6

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 X2 Mobile

4.6

Expert Comparison

ASRock Arc A770 Challenger OC 16 GB лучше по многим параметрам: имеет больше ядер (4096 против 1920), большую память (16 ГБ против 6 ГБ) и пропускную способность (559.9 GB/s против 336.0 GB/s). Она также предназначена для более мощных задач, таких как игра и гейминг, с TDP 225 Вт против 160 Вт у NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 X2 Mobile, что делает ее более подходящей для современных игр и требовательных приложений.

Contents:

Memory ML Performance Compute Power Architecture & Compatibility ML Software Support Clocks & Performance Power Consumption Rendering Additional

Memory

Memory Size

🔥 +167% 16 ГБ
6 GB ×2 (12 ГБ)

Memory Type

GDDR6 GDDR6

Memory Bandwidth

559.9 GB/s 336.0 GB/s ×2 (672 GB/s)

Memory Bus Width

256 бит 192 бит ×2 (384 бит)

ML Performance

FP16 (Half Precision)

🔥 +271% 39.32 TFLOPS
10.6 TFLOPS

BF16 (Brain Float)

No No

TF32 (TensorFloat)

No No

Compute Power

FP32 (Single Precision)

🔥 +271% 19.66 TFLOPS
5.299 TFLOPS

FP64 (Double Precision)

🔥 +1,384% 2.458 TFLOPS
0.1656 TFLOPS

CUDA Cores

🔥 +113% 4,096
1,920 ×2 (3840)

RT Cores

🔥 +7% 32
30 ×2 (60)

Architecture & Compatibility

GPU Architecture

Xe-HPG Turing

SM (Streaming Multiprocessor)

No 30

PCIe Version

PCIe 4.0 x16 PCIe 3.0 x16

ML Software Support

CUDA Version

No 7.5

CUDA Toolkit (first supported)

v10

CUDA Toolkit status

Supported Supported

Clocks & Performance

Base Clock

🔥 +128% 2,150
945

Boost Clock

🔥 +74% 2,400
1,380

Memory Clock

🔥 +25% 2,187
1,750

Power Consumption

Recommended PSU

550 W No

Power Connector

2x 8-pin None

TDP/TGP

225 W
🔥 -29% 160 W

Rendering

Texture Units (TMU)

🔥 +113% 256
120 ×2 (240)

ROP

🔥 +7% 32
30 ×2 (60)

L2 Cache

🔥 +300% 16 MB
4 MB

Additional

Slots

Dual-slot MXM Module

Release Date

Oct. 12, 2022 May 27, 2019

Display Outputs

1x HDMI 2.1
3x DisplayPort 2.0
Portable Device Dependent

Renting is cheaper than buying