GIGABYTE AORUS RTX 5090 XTREME WATERFORCE WB vs NVIDIA Quadro NVS 290

Comparison of GIGABYTE AORUS RTX 5090 XTREME WATERFORCE WB with 32 GB GDDR7 and 21,760 cores vs NVIDIA Quadro NVS 290 with 256 GB DDR2 and 16 cores.

Loading...

Performance Rating

H200 H200
MI325X MI325X
A100 A100

GIGABYTE AORUS RTX 5090 XTREME WATERFORCE WB

GIGABYTE AORUS RTX 5090 XTREME WATERFORCE WB

MI250 MI250
Instinct MI300X Instinct MI300X
RX 7900 XTX RX 7900 XTX

NVIDIA Quadro NVS 290

NVIDIA Quadro NVS 290

Contents:

Memory ML Performance Compute Power Architecture & Compatibility ML Software Support Clocks & Performance Power Consumption Rendering Additional

Memory

Memory Size

32 GB 256 MB

Memory Type

GDDR7 DDR2

Memory Bandwidth

1.79 TB/s 6.400 GB/s

Memory Bus Width

512 бит 64 бит

ML Performance

FP16 (Half Precision)

115.5 TFLOPS No

BF16 (Brain Float)

No No

TF32 (TensorFloat)

No No

Compute Power

FP32 (Single Precision)

115.5 TFLOPS 0.0294 TFLOPS

FP64 (Double Precision)

1.805 TFLOPS No

CUDA Cores

21,760 16

RT Cores

170 No

Architecture & Compatibility

GPU Architecture

Blackwell 2.0 Tesla

SM (Streaming Multiprocessor)

170 2

PCIe Version

PCIe 5.0 x16 PCIe 1.0 x16

ML Software Support

CUDA Version

🔥 12.0
1.1

Clocks & Performance

Base Clock

2,017 No

Boost Clock

2,655 No

Memory Clock

1,750 400

Power Consumption

TDP/TGP

575 W
🔥 -96% 21 W

Recommended PSU

950 W
🔥 -79% 200 W

Power Connector

1x 16-pin None

Rendering

Texture Units (TMU)

680 8

ROP

170 No

L2 Cache

96 MB 16 KB

Additional

Slots

Dual-slot Single-slot

Release Date

Jan. 30, 2025 Oct. 4, 2007

Display Outputs

1x HDMI 2.1b
3x DisplayPort 2.1b
1x DMS-59

Renting is cheaper than buying