ASRock Arc A770 Challenger OC 16 GB vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 4700 X2

Comparison of ASRock Arc A770 Challenger OC 16 GB with 16 GB GDDR6 and 4,096 cores vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 4700 X2 with 1,024 GB GDDR3 and 128 cores.

Loading...

Performance Rating

ASRock Arc A770 Challenger OC 16 GB outperforms NVIDIA Quadro FX 4700 X2 by 608.48% in the overall GPU ARK performance rating

A100 A100
H200 H200
MI325X MI325X

ASRock Arc A770 Challenger OC 16 GB

11.7

ASRock Arc A770 Challenger OC 16 GB

11.7
RX 7900 XTX RX 7900 XTX
MI250 MI250
Instinct MI300X Instinct MI300X

NVIDIA Quadro FX 4700 X2

1.7

NVIDIA Quadro FX 4700 X2

1.7

Contents:

Memory ML Performance Compute Power Architecture & Compatibility ML Software Support Clocks & Performance Power Consumption Rendering Additional

Memory

Memory Size

🔥 16 ГБ
1,024 MB ×2 (2048 ГБ)

Memory Type

GDDR6 GDDR3

Memory Bandwidth

559.9 GB/s 51.20 GB/s ×2 (102.4 GB/s)

Memory Bus Width

256 бит 256 бит ×2 (512 бит)

ML Performance

FP16 (Half Precision)

🔥 39.32 TFLOPS
No

BF16 (Brain Float)

No No

TF32 (TensorFloat)

No No

Compute Power

FP32 (Single Precision)

🔥 +5,020% 19.66 TFLOPS
0.384 TFLOPS

FP64 (Double Precision)

🔥 2.458 TFLOPS
No

CUDA Cores

🔥 +3,100% 4,096
128 ×2 (256)

RT Cores

🔥 32
No

Architecture & Compatibility

GPU Architecture

Xe-HPG Tesla

SM (Streaming Multiprocessor)

No 16

PCIe Version

PCIe 4.0 x16 PCIe 2.0 x16

ML Software Support

CUDA Version

No 1.1

Clocks & Performance

Base Clock

🔥 2,150
No

Boost Clock

🔥 2,400
No

Memory Clock

🔥 +173% 2,187
800

Power Consumption

Recommended PSU

550 W 550 W

Power Connector

2x 8-pin 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

TDP/TGP

🔥 225 W
226 W

Rendering

Texture Units (TMU)

🔥 +300% 256
64 ×2 (128)

ROP

🔥 32
No

L2 Cache

🔥 16 MB
64 KB

Additional

Slots

Dual-slot Dual-slot

Release Date

Oct. 12, 2022 April 18, 2008

Display Outputs

1x HDMI 2.1
3x DisplayPort 2.0
2x DVI
1x S-Video

Renting is cheaper than buying