NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800 vs SPARKLE Arc A310 OmniView

Comparison of NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800 with 1,024 GB GDDR3 and 192 cores vs SPARKLE Arc A310 OmniView with 4 GB GDDR6 and 768 cores.

Loading...

Performance Rating

SPARKLE Arc A310 OmniView outperforms NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800 by 27.91% in the overall GPU ARK performance rating

A100 A100
H200 H200
MI325X MI325X

NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800

1.7

NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800

1.7
RX 7900 XTX RX 7900 XTX
MI250 MI250
Instinct MI300X Instinct MI300X

SPARKLE Arc A310 OmniView

2.2

SPARKLE Arc A310 OmniView

2.2

Contents:

Memory ML Performance Compute Power Architecture & Compatibility ML Software Support Clocks & Performance Power Consumption Rendering Additional

Memory

Memory Size

1,024 MB
🔥 4 ГБ

Memory Type

GDDR3 GDDR6

Memory Bandwidth

51.20 GB/s 124.0 GB/s

Memory Bus Width

256 бит 64 бит

ML Performance

FP16 (Half Precision)

No
🔥 6.144 TFLOPS

BF16 (Brain Float)

No No

TF32 (TensorFloat)

No No

Compute Power

FP32 (Single Precision)

0.4623 TFLOPS
🔥 +565% 3.072 TFLOPS

FP64 (Double Precision)

0.0578 TFLOPS
🔥 +1,229% 0.768 TFLOPS

CUDA Cores

192
🔥 +300% 768

RT Cores

No
🔥 6

Architecture & Compatibility

GPU Architecture

Tesla 2.0 Xe-HPG

SM (Streaming Multiprocessor)

24 No

PCIe Version

PCIe 2.0 x16 PCIe 4.0 x8

ML Software Support

CUDA Version

1.3 No

Clocks & Performance

Base Clock

No
🔥 2,000

Boost Clock

No
🔥 2,000

Memory Clock

800
🔥 +142% 1,937

Power Consumption

Recommended PSU

300 W
🔥 -17% 250 W

Power Connector

1x 6-pin None

TDP/TGP

108 W
🔥 -31% 75 W

Rendering

Texture Units (TMU)

64
🔥 32

ROP

No
🔥 6

L2 Cache

128 KB
🔥 4 MB

Additional

Slots

Single-slot Single-slot

Release Date

March 30, 2009 Nov. 18, 2024

Display Outputs

1x DVI
2x DisplayPort
4x mini-DisplayPort 2.0
4x HDMI 2.1

Renting is cheaper than buying