NVIDIA H200 SXM 141 GB vs NVIDIA Quadro 3000M X2

Comparison of NVIDIA H200 SXM 141 GB with 141 GB HBM3e and 16,896 cores vs NVIDIA Quadro 3000M X2 with 2 GB GDDR5 and 240 cores.

Loading...

Performance Rating

NVIDIA H200 SXM 141 GB outperforms NVIDIA Quadro 3000M X2 by 8,884.0% in the overall GPU ARK performance rating

A100 A100
H200 H200
MI325X MI325X

NVIDIA H200 SXM 141 GB

67.4

NVIDIA H200 SXM 141 GB

67.4
RX 7900 XTX RX 7900 XTX
MI250 MI250
Instinct MI300X Instinct MI300X

NVIDIA Quadro 3000M X2

0.8

NVIDIA Quadro 3000M X2

0.8

Expert Comparison

NVIDIA H200 SXM 141 GB значительно превосходит NVIDIA Quadro 3000M X2 по всем параметрам: количество ядер, объем и тип памяти, пропускная способность, мощность вычислений и энергопотребление. H200 подходит для современных задач, требующих высокой производительности, таких как машинное обучение и большие данные, в то время как Quadro 3000M X2 более подходящ для графических задач и среднего уровня вычислений.

Contents:

Memory ML Performance Compute Power Architecture & Compatibility ML Software Support Clocks & Performance Power Consumption Rendering Benchmarks Additional

Memory

Memory Size

🔥 +6,950% 141 ГБ
2 GB ×2 (4 ГБ)

Memory Type

HBM3e GDDR5

Memory Bandwidth

🔥 4.89 TB/s
80.00 GB/s ×2 (160 GB/s)

Memory Bus Width

6,144 бит 256 бит ×2 (512 бит)

ML Performance

FP16 (Half Precision)

🔥 267.6 TFLOPS
No

BF16 (Brain Float)

No No

TF32 (TensorFloat)

No No

Compute Power

FP32 (Single Precision)

🔥 +15,388% 66.91 TFLOPS
0.432 TFLOPS

FP64 (Double Precision)

🔥 +92,817% 33.45 TFLOPS
0.036 TFLOPS

CUDA Cores

🔥 +6,940% 16,896
240 ×2 (480)

RT Cores

No No

Architecture & Compatibility

GPU Architecture

Hopper Fermi

SM (Streaming Multiprocessor)

🔥 +2,540% 132
5

PCIe Version

PCIe 5.0 x16 MXM-B (3.0)

ML Software Support

CUDA Version

🔥 9.0
2.1

Clocks & Performance

Base Clock

🔥 1,500
No

Boost Clock

🔥 1,980
No

Memory Clock

🔥 +155% 1,593
625

Power Consumption

Recommended PSU

1100 W No

Power Connector

8-pin EPS None

TDP/TGP

700 W
🔥 -79% 150 W

Rendering

Texture Units (TMU)

🔥 +1,220% 528
40 ×2 (80)

ROP

No No

L2 Cache

🔥 50 MB
512 KB

Benchmarks

MLPerf, llama2-70b-99.9 (UNSET)

3 534 tokens/s

MLPerf, llama2-70b-99.9 (fp16)

3 553 tokens/s

MLPerf, llama2-70b-99.9 (fp8)

2 444 tokens/s

MLPerf, llama3.1-405b (fp16)

40.8 tokens/s

MLPerf, llama3.1-405b (fp8)

25.3 tokens/s

MLPerf, llama3.1-8b (fp8)

5 161 tokens/s

MLPerf, deepseek-r1 (fp8)

1 113 tokens/s

MLPerf, mixtral-8x7b (fp8)

7 132 tokens/s

Additional

Slots

🔥 SXM Module
MXM Module

Release Date

Nov. 18, 2024 Feb. 22, 2011

Display Outputs

No outputs
Portable Device Dependent

Renting is cheaper than buying