NVIDIA H200 SXM 141 GB vs Palit RTX 5070 Ti GamingPro-S

Comparison of NVIDIA H200 SXM 141 GB with 141 GB HBM3e and 16,896 cores vs Palit RTX 5070 Ti GamingPro-S with 16 GB GDDR7 and 8,960 cores.

Loading...

Performance Rating

H200 H200
MI325X MI325X
A100 A100

NVIDIA H200 SXM 141 GB

NVIDIA H200 SXM 141 GB

RX 7900 XTX RX 7900 XTX
Instinct MI300X Instinct MI300X
MI250 MI250

Palit RTX 5070 Ti GamingPro-S

Palit RTX 5070 Ti GamingPro-S

Contents:

Memory ML Performance Compute Power Architecture & Compatibility ML Software Support Clocks & Performance Power Consumption Rendering Benchmarks Additional

Memory

Memory Size

141 GB 16 GB

Memory Type

HBM3e GDDR7

Memory Bandwidth

4.89 TB/s 896.0 GB/s

Memory Bus Width

6,144 бит 256 бит

ML Performance

FP16 (Half Precision)

267.6 TFLOPS 43.94 TFLOPS

BF16 (Brain Float)

No No

TF32 (TensorFloat)

No No

Compute Power

FP32 (Single Precision)

66.91 TFLOPS 43.94 TFLOPS

FP64 (Double Precision)

33.45 TFLOPS 0.6866 TFLOPS

CUDA Cores

16,896 8,960

RT Cores

No 70

Architecture & Compatibility

GPU Architecture

Hopper Blackwell 2.0

SM (Streaming Multiprocessor)

132 70

PCIe Version

PCIe 5.0 x16 PCIe 5.0 x16

ML Software Support

CUDA Version

9.0
🔥 12.0

Clocks & Performance

Base Clock

1,500 2,295

Boost Clock

1,980 2,452

Memory Clock

1,593 1,750

Power Consumption

TDP/TGP

700 W
🔥 -57% 300 W

Recommended PSU

1100 W
🔥 -36% 700 W

Power Connector

8-pin EPS 1x 16-pin

Rendering

Texture Units (TMU)

528 280

ROP

No 70

L2 Cache

50 MB 48 MB

Benchmarks

MLPerf, llama2-70b-99.9 (UNSET)

3 534 tokens/s

MLPerf, llama2-70b-99.9 (fp16)

3 553 tokens/s

MLPerf, llama2-70b-99.9 (fp8)

2 444 tokens/s

MLPerf, llama3.1-405b (fp16)

40.8 tokens/s

MLPerf, llama3.1-405b (fp8)

25.3 tokens/s

MLPerf, llama3.1-8b (fp8)

5 161 tokens/s

MLPerf, deepseek-r1 (fp8)

1 113 tokens/s

MLPerf, mixtral-8x7b (fp8)

7 132 tokens/s

Additional

Slots

SXM Module Dual-slot

Release Date

Nov. 18, 2024 Feb. 20, 2025

Display Outputs

No outputs
1x HDMI 2.1b
3x DisplayPort 2.1b

Renting is cheaper than buying