NVIDIA H200 SXM 141 GB vs ONDA RTX 5050 Aegis V1

Comparison of NVIDIA H200 SXM 141 GB with 141 GB HBM3e and 16,896 cores vs ONDA RTX 5050 Aegis V1 with 8 GB GDDR6 and 2,560 cores.

Loading...

Performance Rating

NVIDIA H200 SXM 141 GB outperforms ONDA RTX 5050 Aegis V1 by 855.74% in the overall GPU ARK performance rating

A100 A100
H200 H200
MI325X MI325X

NVIDIA H200 SXM 141 GB

67.4

NVIDIA H200 SXM 141 GB

67.4
RX 7900 XTX RX 7900 XTX
MI250 MI250
Instinct MI300X Instinct MI300X

ONDA RTX 5050 Aegis V1

7.1

ONDA RTX 5050 Aegis V1

7.1

Expert Comparison

NVIDIA H200 SXM 141 GB обладает гораздо более мощными характеристиками: больше ядер (16896 против 2560), большую память (141 ГБ HBM3e против 8 ГБ GDDR6) и значительно большую пропускную способность (4.89 ТБ/с против 320 ГБ/с). Подходит для сложных вычислений и машинного обучения. В то время как ONDA RTX 5050 Aegis V1 более энергоэффективен (TDP 130 Вт против 700 Вт) и предназначен для более простых задач, таких как базовая графика и轻量级机器人的回答需要简洁明了,以下是针对两个显卡的简要对比: NVIDIA H200 SXM 141 GB具有更强的性能,适用于复杂的计算和深度学习任务。相比之下,ONDA RTX 5050 Aegis V1更节能,更适合基本图形和简单任务。

Contents:

Memory ML Performance Compute Power Architecture & Compatibility ML Software Support Clocks & Performance Power Consumption Rendering Benchmarks Additional

Memory

Memory Size

🔥 +1,662% 141 ГБ
8 GB

Memory Type

HBM3e GDDR6

Memory Bandwidth

🔥 4.89 TB/s
320.0 GB/s

Memory Bus Width

6,144 бит 128 бит

ML Performance

FP16 (Half Precision)

🔥 +1,932% 267.6 TFLOPS
13.17 TFLOPS

BF16 (Brain Float)

No No

TF32 (TensorFloat)

No No

Compute Power

FP32 (Single Precision)

🔥 +408% 66.91 TFLOPS
13.17 TFLOPS

FP64 (Double Precision)

🔥 +16,154% 33.45 TFLOPS
0.2058 TFLOPS

CUDA Cores

🔥 +560% 16,896
2,560

RT Cores

No
🔥 20

Architecture & Compatibility

GPU Architecture

Hopper Blackwell 2.0

SM (Streaming Multiprocessor)

🔥 +560% 132
20

PCIe Version

PCIe 5.0 x16 PCIe 5.0 x8

ML Software Support

CUDA Version

9.0
🔥 12.0

Clocks & Performance

Base Clock

1,500
🔥 +54% 2,317

Boost Clock

1,980
🔥 +30% 2,572

Memory Clock

1,593
🔥 +57% 2,500

Power Consumption

Recommended PSU

1100 W
🔥 -73% 300 W

Power Connector

8-pin EPS 1x 8-pin

TDP/TGP

700 W
🔥 -81% 130 W

Rendering

Texture Units (TMU)

🔥 +560% 528
80

ROP

No
🔥 20

L2 Cache

🔥 +108% 50 MB
24 MB

Benchmarks

MLPerf, llama2-70b-99.9 (UNSET)

3 534 tokens/s

MLPerf, llama2-70b-99.9 (fp16)

3 553 tokens/s

MLPerf, llama2-70b-99.9 (fp8)

2 444 tokens/s

MLPerf, llama3.1-405b (fp16)

40.8 tokens/s

MLPerf, llama3.1-405b (fp8)

25.3 tokens/s

MLPerf, llama3.1-8b (fp8)

5 161 tokens/s

MLPerf, deepseek-r1 (fp8)

1 113 tokens/s

MLPerf, mixtral-8x7b (fp8)

7 132 tokens/s

Additional

Slots

🔥 SXM Module
Dual-slot

Release Date

Nov. 18, 2024 July 1, 2025

Display Outputs

No outputs
1x HDMI 2.1b
3x DisplayPort 2.1b

Renting is cheaper than buying