ASRock Arc A770 Challenger OC 16 GB vs NVIDIA GRID RTX T10-8

Comparison of ASRock Arc A770 Challenger OC 16 GB with 16 GB GDDR6 and 4,096 cores vs NVIDIA GRID RTX T10-8 with 8 GB GDDR6 and 3,584 cores.

Loading...

Performance Rating

ASRock Arc A770 Challenger OC 16 GB outperforms NVIDIA GRID RTX T10-8 by 48.92% in the overall GPU ARK performance rating

A100 A100
H200 H200
MI325X MI325X

ASRock Arc A770 Challenger OC 16 GB

11.7

ASRock Arc A770 Challenger OC 16 GB

11.7
RX 7900 XTX RX 7900 XTX
MI250 MI250
Instinct MI300X Instinct MI300X

NVIDIA GRID RTX T10-8

7.9

NVIDIA GRID RTX T10-8

7.9

Contents:

Memory ML Performance Compute Power Architecture & Compatibility ML Software Support Clocks & Performance Power Consumption Rendering Additional

Memory

Memory Size

🔥 +100% 16 ГБ
8 GB

Memory Type

GDDR6 GDDR6

Memory Bandwidth

559.9 GB/s 672.0 GB/s

Memory Bus Width

256 бит 384 бит

ML Performance

FP16 (Half Precision)

🔥 +97% 39.32 TFLOPS
20.0 TFLOPS

BF16 (Brain Float)

No No

TF32 (TensorFloat)

No No

Compute Power

FP32 (Single Precision)

🔥 +97% 19.66 TFLOPS
9.999 TFLOPS

FP64 (Double Precision)

🔥 +687% 2.458 TFLOPS
0.3125 TFLOPS

CUDA Cores

🔥 +14% 4,096
3,584

RT Cores

🔥 32
56

Architecture & Compatibility

GPU Architecture

Xe-HPG Turing

SM (Streaming Multiprocessor)

No 56

PCIe Version

PCIe 4.0 x16 PCIe 3.0 x16

ML Software Support

CUDA Version

No 7.5

Clocks & Performance

Base Clock

🔥 +102% 2,150
1,065

Boost Clock

🔥 +72% 2,400
1,395

Memory Clock

🔥 +25% 2,187
1,750

Power Consumption

Recommended PSU

550 W
🔥 -18% 450 W

Power Connector

2x 8-pin 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

TDP/TGP

225 W
🔥 -33% 150 W

Rendering

Texture Units (TMU)

🔥 +14% 256
224

ROP

🔥 32
56

L2 Cache

🔥 +167% 16 MB
6 MB

Additional

Slots

Dual-slot Dual-slot

Release Date

Oct. 12, 2022 No

Display Outputs

1x HDMI 2.1
3x DisplayPort 2.0
No outputs

Renting is cheaper than buying