NVIDIA A800 SXM4 80 GB vs Sapphire GPRO E9260

Comparison of NVIDIA A800 SXM4 80 GB with 80 GB HBM2e and 6,912 cores vs Sapphire GPRO E9260 with 8 GB GDDR5 and 896 cores.

Loading...

Performance Rating

NVIDIA A800 SXM4 80 GB outperforms Sapphire GPRO E9260 by 1,025.65% in the overall GPU ARK performance rating

A100 A100
H200 H200
MI325X MI325X

NVIDIA A800 SXM4 80 GB

25.9

NVIDIA A800 SXM4 80 GB

25.9
RX 7900 XTX RX 7900 XTX
MI250 MI250
Instinct MI300X Instinct MI300X

Sapphire GPRO E9260

2.3

Sapphire GPRO E9260

2.3

Contents:

Memory ML Performance Compute Power Architecture & Compatibility ML Software Support Clocks & Performance Power Consumption Rendering Additional

Memory

Memory Size

🔥 +900% 80 ГБ
8 GB

Memory Type

HBM2e GDDR5

Memory Bandwidth

🔥 2.04 TB/s
112.0 GB/s

Memory Bus Width

5,120 бит 128 бит

ML Performance

FP16 (Half Precision)

🔥 +3,008% 77.97 TFLOPS
2.509 TFLOPS

BF16 (Brain Float)

🔥 311.84 TFLOPS
No

TF32 (TensorFloat)

🔥 155.92
No

Compute Power

FP32 (Single Precision)

🔥 +677% 19.49 TFLOPS
2.509 TFLOPS

FP64 (Double Precision)

🔥 +6,116% 9.746 TFLOPS
0.1568 TFLOPS

CUDA Cores

🔥 +671% 6,912
896

RT Cores

No No

Architecture & Compatibility

GPU Architecture

Ampere GCN 4.0

SM (Streaming Multiprocessor)

🔥 108
No

PCIe Version

PCIe 4.0 x16 PCIe 3.0 x8

ML Software Support

CUDA Version

8.0 No

Clocks & Performance

Base Clock

🔥 +6% 1,155
1,090

Boost Clock

🔥 +1% 1,410
1,400

Memory Clock

🔥 1,593
1,750

Power Consumption

Recommended PSU

800 W No

Power Connector

None None

TDP/TGP

400 W
🔥 -80% 80 W

Rendering

Texture Units (TMU)

🔥 +800% 432
48

ROP

No No

L2 Cache

🔥 40 MB
1024 KB

Additional

Slots

🔥 SXM Module
Single-slot

Release Date

Aug. 11, 2022 Sept. 27, 2016

Display Outputs

No outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
4x DisplayPort 1.4a

Renting is cheaper than buying