NVIDIA A800 SXM4 80 GB vs NVIDIA Quadro 3000M X2

Comparison of NVIDIA A800 SXM4 80 GB with 80 GB HBM2e and 6,912 cores vs NVIDIA Quadro 3000M X2 with 2 GB GDDR5 and 240 cores.

Loading...

Performance Rating

NVIDIA A800 SXM4 80 GB outperforms NVIDIA Quadro 3000M X2 by 3,352.0% in the overall GPU ARK performance rating

A100 A100
H200 H200
MI325X MI325X

NVIDIA A800 SXM4 80 GB

25.9

NVIDIA A800 SXM4 80 GB

25.9
RX 7900 XTX RX 7900 XTX
MI250 MI250
Instinct MI300X Instinct MI300X

NVIDIA Quadro 3000M X2

0.8

NVIDIA Quadro 3000M X2

0.8

Contents:

Memory ML Performance Compute Power Architecture & Compatibility ML Software Support Clocks & Performance Power Consumption Rendering Additional

Memory

Memory Size

🔥 +3,900% 80 ГБ
2 GB ×2 (4 ГБ)

Memory Type

HBM2e GDDR5

Memory Bandwidth

🔥 2.04 TB/s
80.00 GB/s ×2 (160 GB/s)

Memory Bus Width

5,120 бит 256 бит ×2 (512 бит)

ML Performance

FP16 (Half Precision)

🔥 77.97 TFLOPS
No

BF16 (Brain Float)

🔥 311.84 TFLOPS
No

TF32 (TensorFloat)

🔥 155.92
No

Compute Power

FP32 (Single Precision)

🔥 +4,412% 19.49 TFLOPS
0.432 TFLOPS

FP64 (Double Precision)

🔥 +26,972% 9.746 TFLOPS
0.036 TFLOPS

CUDA Cores

🔥 +2,780% 6,912
240 ×2 (480)

RT Cores

No No

Architecture & Compatibility

GPU Architecture

Ampere Fermi

SM (Streaming Multiprocessor)

🔥 +2,060% 108
5

PCIe Version

PCIe 4.0 x16 MXM-B (3.0)

ML Software Support

CUDA Version

🔥 8.0
2.1

Clocks & Performance

Base Clock

🔥 1,155
No

Boost Clock

🔥 1,410
No

Memory Clock

🔥 +155% 1,593
625

Power Consumption

Recommended PSU

800 W No

Power Connector

None None

TDP/TGP

400 W
🔥 -62% 150 W

Rendering

Texture Units (TMU)

🔥 +980% 432
40 ×2 (80)

ROP

No No

L2 Cache

🔥 40 MB
512 KB

Additional

Slots

🔥 SXM Module
MXM Module

Release Date

Aug. 11, 2022 Feb. 22, 2011

Display Outputs

No outputs
Portable Device Dependent

Renting is cheaper than buying