NVIDIA A100 PCIe 80 GB vs NVIDIA Quadro K2000M Embedded

Comparison of NVIDIA A100 PCIe 80 GB with 80 GB HBM2e and 6,912 cores vs NVIDIA Quadro K2000M Embedded with 2 GB GDDR5 and 384 cores.

Loading...

Performance Rating

NVIDIA A100 PCIe 80 GB outperforms NVIDIA Quadro K2000M Embedded by 2,812.5% in the overall GPU ARK performance rating

A100 A100
H200 H200
MI325X MI325X

NVIDIA A100 PCIe 80 GB

25.6

NVIDIA A100 PCIe 80 GB

25.6
RX 7900 XTX RX 7900 XTX
MI250 MI250
Instinct MI300X Instinct MI300X

NVIDIA Quadro K2000M Embedded

0.9

NVIDIA Quadro K2000M Embedded

0.9

Contents:

Memory ML Performance Compute Power Architecture & Compatibility ML Software Support Clocks & Performance Power Consumption Rendering Additional

Memory

Memory Size

🔥 +3,900% 80 ГБ
2 GB

Memory Type

HBM2e GDDR5

Memory Bandwidth

🔥 1.94 TB/s
57.60 GB/s

Memory Bus Width

5,120 бит 128 бит

ML Performance

FP16 (Half Precision)

🔥 77.97 TFLOPS
No

BF16 (Brain Float)

🔥 311.84 TFLOPS
No

TF32 (TensorFloat)

🔥 155.92
No

Compute Power

FP32 (Single Precision)

🔥 +2,299% 19.49 TFLOPS
0.8125 TFLOPS

FP64 (Double Precision)

🔥 +28,649% 9.746 TFLOPS
0.0339 TFLOPS

CUDA Cores

🔥 +1,700% 6,912
384

RT Cores

No No

Architecture & Compatibility

GPU Architecture

Ampere Kepler

SM (Streaming Multiprocessor)

🔥 +5,300% 108
2

PCIe Version

PCIe 4.0 x16 PCIe 3.0 x16

ML Software Support

CUDA Version

🔥 8.0
3.0

Clocks & Performance

Base Clock

🔥 +28% 1,065
835

Boost Clock

🔥 +33% 1,410
1,058

Memory Clock

🔥 +68% 1,512
900

Power Consumption

Recommended PSU

700 W No

Power Connector

8-pin EPS No

TDP/TGP

300 W
🔥 -85% 45 W

Rendering

Texture Units (TMU)

🔥 +1,250% 432
32

ROP

No No

L2 Cache

🔥 80 MB
256 KB

Additional

Slots

Dual-slot IGP

Release Date

June 28, 2021 March 22, 2012

Display Outputs

No outputs
1x DVI

Renting is cheaper than buying