Matrox D1480 Quad DisplayPort vs Mushkin GTX 295 Single PCB

Comparison of Matrox D1480 Quad DisplayPort with 4 GB GDDR5 and 512 cores vs Mushkin GTX 295 Single PCB with 896 GB GDDR3 and 240 cores.

Loading...

Performance Rating

Mushkin GTX 295 Single PCB outperforms Matrox D1480 Quad DisplayPort by 73.47% in the overall GPU ARK performance rating

A100 A100
H200 H200
MI325X MI325X

Matrox D1480 Quad DisplayPort

1.5

Matrox D1480 Quad DisplayPort

1.5
RX 7900 XTX RX 7900 XTX
MI250 MI250
Instinct MI300X Instinct MI300X

Mushkin GTX 295 Single PCB

2.6

Mushkin GTX 295 Single PCB

2.6

Contents:

Memory ML Performance Compute Power Architecture & Compatibility ML Software Support Clocks & Performance Power Consumption Rendering Additional

Memory

Memory Size

🔥 4 ГБ
896 MB ×2 (1792 ГБ)

Memory Type

GDDR5 GDDR3

Memory Bandwidth

96.13 GB/s 112.9 GB/s ×2 (225.8 GB/s)

Memory Bus Width

128 бит 448 бит ×2 (896 бит)

ML Performance

FP16 (Half Precision)

🔥 0.0223 TFLOPS
No

BF16 (Brain Float)

No No

TF32 (TensorFloat)

No No

Compute Power

FP32 (Single Precision)

🔥 +139% 1.4254 TFLOPS
0.5962 TFLOPS

FP64 (Double Precision)

🔥 0.0445 TFLOPS
0.0745 TFLOPS

CUDA Cores

🔥 +113% 512
240 ×2 (480)

RT Cores

No No

Architecture & Compatibility

GPU Architecture

Pascal Tesla 2.0

SM (Streaming Multiprocessor)

🔥 4
30

PCIe Version

PCIe 3.0 x16 PCIe 2.0 x16

ML Software Support

CUDA Version

🔥 6.1
1.3

Clocks & Performance

Base Clock

🔥 1,354
No

Boost Clock

🔥 1,392
No

Memory Clock

🔥 +49% 1,502
1,008

Power Consumption

Recommended PSU

🔥 -67% 200 W
600 W

Power Connector

None 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

TDP/TGP

🔥 -84% 47 W
289 W

Rendering

Texture Units (TMU)

🔥 32
80 ×2 (160)

ROP

No No

L2 Cache

🔥 +357% 1024 KB
224 KB

Additional

Slots

Single-slot Dual-slot

Release Date

May 21, 2020 June 16, 2009

Display Outputs

4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
2x DVI

Renting is cheaper than buying