Intel GMA 500 vs NVIDIA B300

Comparison Intel GMA 500 and 32 cores vs NVIDIA B300 with 144 GB HBM3e and 18,944 cores.

Loading...

Performance Rating

A100 A100
H200 H200
MI325X MI325X

Intel GMA 500

Intel GMA 500

RX 7900 XTX RX 7900 XTX
MI250 MI250
Instinct MI300X Instinct MI300X

NVIDIA B300

71.9

NVIDIA B300

71.9

Expert Comparison

Intel GMA 500 (2008) намного уступает NVIDIA B300 (2025) по всем параметрам. B300 имеет гораздо больше ядер, больше памяти и значительно большую пропускную способность. Для современных игр и вычислений B300 намного эффективнее, хотя его высокая TDP указывает на потребление большей энергии.

Contents:

Memory ML Performance Compute Power Architecture & Compatibility ML Software Support Clocks & Performance Power Consumption Rendering Additional

Memory

Memory Size

No
🔥 144 ГБ ×2 (288 ГБ)

Memory Type

System Shared HBM3e

Memory Bandwidth

System Dependent
🔥 4.10 TB/s ×2 (8.2 TB/s)

Memory Bus Width

No 4,096 бит ×2 (8192 бит)

ML Performance

FP16 (Half Precision)

No
🔥 1.2318 TFLOPS

BF16 (Brain Float)

No No

TF32 (TensorFloat)

No No

Compute Power

FP32 (Single Precision)

0.0128 TFLOPS
🔥 +601,384% 76.99 TFLOPS

FP64 (Double Precision)

No
🔥 1.2029 TFLOPS

CUDA Cores

32
🔥 +59,100% 18,944 ×2 (37888)

RT Cores

No No

Architecture & Compatibility

GPU Architecture

PowerVR SGX535 Blackwell Ultra

SM (Streaming Multiprocessor)

No
🔥 148

PCIe Version

PCIe 1.0 x16 PCIe 5.0 x16

ML Software Support

CUDA Version

No 10.3

CUDA Toolkit (first supported)

v12

CUDA Toolkit status

Supported Supported

Clocks & Performance

Base Clock

No
🔥 1,665

Boost Clock

No
🔥 2,032

Memory Clock

No
🔥 2,000

Power Consumption

Recommended PSU

No 1800 W

Power Connector

No No

TDP/TGP

unknown 1400 W

Rendering

Texture Units (TMU)

4
🔥 +14,700% 592 ×2 (1184)

ROP

No No

L2 Cache

No
🔥 50 MB

Additional

Slots

IGP
🔥 SXM Module

Release Date

March 2, 2008 Sept. 11, 2025

Display Outputs

Portable Device Dependent
No outputs

Renting is cheaper than buying