Intel Arctic Sound-M vs NVIDIA RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF

Comparison of Intel Arctic Sound-M with 16 GB HBM2e and 8,192 cores vs NVIDIA RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF with 24 GB GDDR7 and 8,960 cores.

Loading...

Performance Rating

Intel Arctic Sound-M outperforms NVIDIA RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF by 16.2% in the overall GPU ARK performance rating

A100 A100
H200 H200
MI325X MI325X

Intel Arctic Sound-M

15.4

Intel Arctic Sound-M

15.4
RX 7900 XTX RX 7900 XTX
MI250 MI250
Instinct MI300X Instinct MI300X

NVIDIA RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF

13.3

NVIDIA RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF

13.3

Contents:

Memory ML Performance Compute Power Architecture & Compatibility ML Software Support Clocks & Performance Power Consumption Rendering Additional

Memory

Memory Size

16 GB
🔥 +50% 24 ГБ

Memory Type

HBM2e GDDR7

Memory Bandwidth

🔥 1.23 TB/s
432.0 GB/s

Memory Bus Width

4,096 бит 192 бит

ML Performance

FP16 (Half Precision)

🔥 +15% 29.49 TFLOPS
25.66 TFLOPS

BF16 (Brain Float)

No No

TF32 (TensorFloat)

No No

Compute Power

FP32 (Single Precision)

14.75 TFLOPS
🔥 +74% 25.66 TFLOPS

FP64 (Double Precision)

🔥 +819% 3.686 TFLOPS
0.401 TFLOPS

CUDA Cores

8,192
🔥 +9% 8,960

RT Cores

No
🔥 70

Architecture & Compatibility

GPU Architecture

Generation 12.5 Blackwell 2.0

SM (Streaming Multiprocessor)

No
🔥 70

PCIe Version

PCIe 4.0 x16 PCIe 5.0 x8

ML Software Support

CUDA Version

No 12.0

Clocks & Performance

Base Clock

No
🔥 577

Boost Clock

No
🔥 1,432

Memory Clock

🔥 +7% 1,200
1,125

Power Consumption

Recommended PSU

900 W
🔥 -72% 250 W

Power Connector

8-pin EPS None

TDP/TGP

500 W
🔥 -86% 70 W

Rendering

Texture Units (TMU)

256
🔥 +9% 280

ROP

No
🔥 70

L2 Cache

🔥 8 MB
48 MB

Additional

Slots

Single-slot Dual-slot

Release Date

March 12, 2022 Aug. 11, 2025

Display Outputs

No outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort 2.1b

Renting is cheaper than buying