AMD Radeon Instinct MI325X vs Intel Arc Pro B60

Comparison AMD Radeon Instinct MI325X with 288 GB HBM3e and 19,456 cores vs Intel Arc Pro B60 with 24 GB GDDR6 and 2,560 cores.

Loading...

Performance Rating

AMD Radeon Instinct MI325X outperforms Intel Arc Pro B60 by 1,017.32% in the overall GPU ARK performance rating

A100 A100
H200 H200
MI325X MI325X

AMD Radeon Instinct MI325X

100.0

AMD Radeon Instinct MI325X

100.0
RX 7900 XTX RX 7900 XTX
MI250 MI250
Instinct MI300X Instinct MI300X

Intel Arc Pro B60

9.0

Intel Arc Pro B60

9.0

Expert Comparison

AMD Radeon Instinct MI325X значительно превосходит Intel Arc Pro B60 в производительности благодаря большему количеству ядер (19456 против 2560), большей пропускной способности памяти (10.3 ТБ/с против 456 ГБ/с) и более высокому индексу GPU Performance (100.0 против 8.9). MI325X также предназначена для более сложных задач, таких как машинное обучение и наука, из-за своей HBM3e памяти и высокой TDP. Intel Arc Pro B60 больше подходит для базовых задач и имеет более низкое энергопотребление.

Contents:

Memory ML Performance Compute Power Architecture & Compatibility ML Software Support Clocks & Performance Power Consumption Rendering Benchmarks Additional

Memory

Memory Size

🔥 +1,100% 288 ГБ
24 GB

Memory Type

HBM3e GDDR6

Memory Bandwidth

🔥 10.3 TB/s
456.0 GB/s

Memory Bus Width

8,192 бит 192 бит

ML Performance

FP16 (Half Precision)

🔥 +2,559% 653.7 TFLOPS
24.58 TFLOPS

BF16 (Brain Float)

No No

TF32 (TensorFloat)

No No

Compute Power

FP32 (Single Precision)

🔥 +565% 81.72 TFLOPS
12.29 TFLOPS

FP64 (Double Precision)

🔥 +2,560% 81.72 TFLOPS
3.072 TFLOPS

CUDA Cores

🔥 +660% 19,456
2,560

RT Cores

No
🔥 20

Architecture & Compatibility

GPU Architecture

CDNA 3.0 Xe2-HPG

SM (Streaming Multiprocessor)

No No

PCIe Version

PCIe 5.0 x16 PCIe 5.0 x8

ML Software Support

CUDA Version

No No

CUDA Toolkit status

Supported Supported

Clocks & Performance

Base Clock

1,000
🔥 +100% 2,000

Boost Clock

2,100
🔥 +14% 2,400

Memory Clock

🔥 +6% 2,525
2,375

Power Consumption

Recommended PSU

1400 W
🔥 -61% 550 W

Power Connector

None 1x 8-pin

TDP/TGP

1000 W
🔥 -80% 200 W

Rendering

Texture Units (TMU)

🔥 +660% 1,216
160

ROP

No
🔥 20

L2 Cache

16 MB
🔥 4 MB

Benchmarks

MLPerf, llama2-70b-99.9 (Dummy)

3 596 tokens/s

MLPerf, llama2-70b-99.9 (fp8)

1 946 tokens/s

llama.cpp, llama-2-7b-Q4_0

22.4 tokens/s

MLPerf, mixtral-8x7b (fp8)

6 975 tokens/s

Additional

Slots

OAM Module Dual-slot

Release Date

Oct. 12, 2024 Sept. 5, 2025

Display Outputs

No outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort 2.1

Renting is cheaper than buying