GIGABYTE GTX TITAN Z vs Intel Arc B770

Comparison of GIGABYTE GTX TITAN Z with 6 GB GDDR5 and 2,880 cores vs Intel Arc B770 with 16 GB GDDR6 and 4,096 cores.

Loading...

Performance Rating

Intel Arc B770 outperforms GIGABYTE GTX TITAN Z by 140.88% in the overall GPU ARK performance rating

A100 A100
H200 H200
MI325X MI325X

GIGABYTE GTX TITAN Z

4.8

GIGABYTE GTX TITAN Z

4.8
RX 7900 XTX RX 7900 XTX
MI250 MI250
Instinct MI300X Instinct MI300X

Intel Arc B770

11.5

Intel Arc B770

11.5

Contents:

Memory ML Performance Compute Power Architecture & Compatibility ML Software Support Clocks & Performance Power Consumption Rendering Additional

Memory

Memory Size

6 GB ×2 (12 ГБ)
🔥 +167% 16 ГБ

Memory Type

GDDR5 GDDR6

Memory Bandwidth

336.0 GB/s ×2 (672 GB/s) 512.0 GB/s

Memory Bus Width

384 бит ×2 (768 бит) 256 бит

ML Performance

FP16 (Half Precision)

No
🔥 39.32 TFLOPS

BF16 (Brain Float)

No No

TF32 (TensorFloat)

No No

Compute Power

FP32 (Single Precision)

5.046 TFLOPS
🔥 +290% 19.66 TFLOPS

FP64 (Double Precision)

1.682 TFLOPS
🔥 +46% 2.458 TFLOPS

CUDA Cores

2,880 ×2 (5760)
🔥 +42% 4,096

RT Cores

No
🔥 32

Architecture & Compatibility

GPU Architecture

Kepler Xe2-HPG

SM (Streaming Multiprocessor)

No No

PCIe Version

PCIe 3.0 x16 PCIe 4.0 x16

ML Software Support

CUDA Version

3.5 No

Clocks & Performance

Base Clock

705
🔥 +198% 2,100

Boost Clock

876
🔥 +174% 2,400

Memory Clock

1,750
🔥 +14% 2,000

Power Consumption

Recommended PSU

750 W
🔥 -27% 550 W

Power Connector

2x 8-pin 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

TDP/TGP

375 W
🔥 -40% 225 W

Rendering

Texture Units (TMU)

240 ×2 (480)
🔥 +7% 256

ROP

No
🔥 32

L2 Cache

1536 KB
🔥 16 MB

Additional

Slots

Triple-slot Dual-slot

Release Date

May 28, 2014 March 12, 2026

Display Outputs

2x DVI
1x HDMI 1.4a
1x DisplayPort 1.2
1x HDMI 2.1a
3x DisplayPort 2.1

Renting is cheaper than buying