GIGABYTE AORUS RTX 5090 INFINITY vs NVIDIA Quadro 3000M X2

Comparison of GIGABYTE AORUS RTX 5090 INFINITY with 32 GB GDDR7 and 21,760 cores vs NVIDIA Quadro 3000M X2 with 2 GB GDDR5 and 240 cores.

Loading...

Performance Rating

GIGABYTE AORUS RTX 5090 INFINITY outperforms NVIDIA Quadro 3000M X2 by 6,192.0% in the overall GPU ARK performance rating

A100 A100
H200 H200
MI325X MI325X

GIGABYTE AORUS RTX 5090 INFINITY

47.2

GIGABYTE AORUS RTX 5090 INFINITY

47.2
RX 7900 XTX RX 7900 XTX
MI250 MI250
Instinct MI300X Instinct MI300X

NVIDIA Quadro 3000M X2

0.8

NVIDIA Quadro 3000M X2

0.8

Contents:

Memory ML Performance Compute Power Architecture & Compatibility ML Software Support Clocks & Performance Power Consumption Rendering Additional

Memory

Memory Size

🔥 +1,500% 32 ГБ
2 GB ×2 (4 ГБ)

Memory Type

GDDR7 GDDR5

Memory Bandwidth

🔥 1.79 TB/s
80.00 GB/s ×2 (160 GB/s)

Memory Bus Width

512 бит 256 бит ×2 (512 бит)

ML Performance

FP16 (Half Precision)

🔥 118.8 TFLOPS
No

BF16 (Brain Float)

No No

TF32 (TensorFloat)

No No

Compute Power

FP32 (Single Precision)

🔥 +27,400% 118.8 TFLOPS
0.432 TFLOPS

FP64 (Double Precision)

🔥 +5,056% 1.856 TFLOPS
0.036 TFLOPS

CUDA Cores

🔥 +8,967% 21,760
240 ×2 (480)

RT Cores

🔥 170
No

Architecture & Compatibility

GPU Architecture

Blackwell 2.0 Fermi

SM (Streaming Multiprocessor)

🔥 +3,300% 170
5

PCIe Version

PCIe 5.0 x16 MXM-B (3.0)

ML Software Support

CUDA Version

🔥 12.0
2.1

Clocks & Performance

Base Clock

🔥 2,017
No

Boost Clock

🔥 2,730
No

Memory Clock

🔥 +180% 1,750
625

Power Consumption

Recommended PSU

950 W No

Power Connector

1x 16-pin None

TDP/TGP

575 W
🔥 -74% 150 W

Rendering

Texture Units (TMU)

🔥 +1,600% 680
40 ×2 (80)

ROP

🔥 170
No

L2 Cache

🔥 96 MB
512 KB

Additional

Slots

Triple-slot MXM Module

Release Date

Jan. 30, 2025 Feb. 22, 2011

Display Outputs

1x HDMI 2.1b
3x DisplayPort 2.1b
Portable Device Dependent

Renting is cheaper than buying