Galaxy GTX 750 Ti Slim vs Matrox D1480 Quad DisplayPort

Comparison of Galaxy GTX 750 Ti Slim with 2 GB GDDR5 and 640 cores vs Matrox D1480 Quad DisplayPort with 4 GB GDDR5 and 512 cores.

Loading...

Performance Rating

Matrox D1480 Quad DisplayPort outperforms Galaxy GTX 750 Ti Slim by 14.84% in the overall GPU ARK performance rating

A100 A100
H200 H200
MI325X MI325X

Galaxy GTX 750 Ti Slim

1.3

Galaxy GTX 750 Ti Slim

1.3
RX 7900 XTX RX 7900 XTX
MI250 MI250
Instinct MI300X Instinct MI300X

Matrox D1480 Quad DisplayPort

1.5

Matrox D1480 Quad DisplayPort

1.5

Contents:

Memory ML Performance Compute Power Architecture & Compatibility ML Software Support Clocks & Performance Power Consumption Rendering Additional

Memory

Memory Size

2 GB
🔥 +100% 4 ГБ

Memory Type

GDDR5 GDDR5

Memory Bandwidth

86.40 GB/s 96.13 GB/s

Memory Bus Width

128 бит 128 бит

ML Performance

FP16 (Half Precision)

No
🔥 0.0223 TFLOPS

BF16 (Brain Float)

No No

TF32 (TensorFloat)

No No

Compute Power

FP32 (Single Precision)

1.3888 TFLOPS
🔥 +3% 1.4254 TFLOPS

FP64 (Double Precision)

0.0434 TFLOPS
🔥 +3% 0.0445 TFLOPS

CUDA Cores

640
🔥 512

RT Cores

No No

Architecture & Compatibility

GPU Architecture

Maxwell Pascal

SM (Streaming Multiprocessor)

No
🔥 4

PCIe Version

PCIe 3.0 x16 PCIe 3.0 x16

ML Software Support

CUDA Version

5.0
🔥 6.1

Clocks & Performance

Base Clock

1,020
🔥 +33% 1,354

Boost Clock

1,085
🔥 +28% 1,392

Memory Clock

1,350
🔥 +11% 1,502

Power Consumption

Recommended PSU

250 W
🔥 -20% 200 W

Power Connector

None None

TDP/TGP

60 W
🔥 -22% 47 W

Rendering

Texture Units (TMU)

40
🔥 32

ROP

No No

L2 Cache

2 MB
🔥 +51,100% 1024 KB

Additional

Slots

Single-slot Single-slot

Release Date

Feb. 18, 2014 May 21, 2020

Display Outputs

2x DVI
1x mini-HDMI 1.4a

1x DVI
1x HDMI 1.4a
1x VGA
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
4x DisplayPort 1.4a

Renting is cheaper than buying