EIZO MED-XN72 vs SPARKLE Arc A310 OmniView

Comparison of EIZO MED-XN72 with 5 GB GDDR5X and 1,280 cores vs SPARKLE Arc A310 OmniView with 4 GB GDDR6 and 768 cores.

Loading...

Performance Rating

H200 H200
MI325X MI325X
A100 A100

EIZO MED-XN72

EIZO MED-XN72

RX 7900 XTX RX 7900 XTX
Instinct MI300X Instinct MI300X
MI250 MI250

SPARKLE Arc A310 OmniView

SPARKLE Arc A310 OmniView

Contents:

Memory ML Performance Compute Power Architecture & Compatibility ML Software Support Clocks & Performance Power Consumption Rendering Additional

Memory

Memory Size

5 GB 4 GB

Memory Type

GDDR5X GDDR6

Memory Bandwidth

200.2 GB/s 124.0 GB/s

Memory Bus Width

160 бит 64 бит

ML Performance

FP16 (Half Precision)

0.0597 TFLOPS 6.144 TFLOPS

BF16 (Brain Float)

No No

TF32 (TensorFloat)

No No

Compute Power

FP32 (Single Precision)

3.822 TFLOPS 3.072 TFLOPS

FP64 (Double Precision)

0.1194 TFLOPS 0.768 TFLOPS

CUDA Cores

1,280 768

RT Cores

No 6

Architecture & Compatibility

GPU Architecture

Pascal Xe-HPG

SM (Streaming Multiprocessor)

10 No

PCIe Version

PCIe 3.0 x16 PCIe 4.0 x8

ML Software Support

CUDA Version

6.1 No

Clocks & Performance

Base Clock

1,000 2,000

Boost Clock

1,493 2,000

Memory Clock

1,251 1,937

Power Consumption

TDP/TGP

75 W 75 W

Recommended PSU

250 W 250 W

Power Connector

None None

Rendering

Texture Units (TMU)

80 32

ROP

No 6

L2 Cache

1280 KB 4 MB

Additional

Slots

Single-slot Single-slot

Release Date

June 10, 2019 Nov. 18, 2024

Display Outputs

4x DisplayPort 1.4a
4x mini-DisplayPort 2.0
4x HDMI 2.1

Renting is cheaper than buying