ASRock Arc A770 Challenger OC 16 GB vs EIZO MED-X90

Comparison of ASRock Arc A770 Challenger OC 16 GB with 16 GB GDDR6 and 4,096 cores vs EIZO MED-X90 with 8 GB GDDR5 and 1,792 cores.

Loading...

Performance Rating

ASRock Arc A770 Challenger OC 16 GB outperforms EIZO MED-X90 by 280.78% in the overall GPU ARK performance rating

A100 A100
H200 H200
MI325X MI325X

ASRock Arc A770 Challenger OC 16 GB

11.7

ASRock Arc A770 Challenger OC 16 GB

11.7
RX 7900 XTX RX 7900 XTX
MI250 MI250
Instinct MI300X Instinct MI300X

EIZO MED-X90

3.1

EIZO MED-X90

3.1

Contents:

Memory ML Performance Compute Power Architecture & Compatibility ML Software Support Clocks & Performance Power Consumption Rendering Additional

Memory

Memory Size

🔥 +100% 16 ГБ
8 GB

Memory Type

GDDR6 GDDR5

Memory Bandwidth

559.9 GB/s 160.0 GB/s

Memory Bus Width

256 бит 256 бит

ML Performance

FP16 (Half Precision)

🔥 +1,093% 39.32 TFLOPS
3.297 TFLOPS

BF16 (Brain Float)

No No

TF32 (TensorFloat)

No No

Compute Power

FP32 (Single Precision)

🔥 +496% 19.66 TFLOPS
3.297 TFLOPS

FP64 (Double Precision)

🔥 +1,093% 2.458 TFLOPS
0.2061 TFLOPS

CUDA Cores

🔥 +129% 4,096
1,792

RT Cores

🔥 32
No

Architecture & Compatibility

GPU Architecture

Xe-HPG GCN 3.0

SM (Streaming Multiprocessor)

No No

PCIe Version

PCIe 4.0 x16 PCIe 3.0 x16

ML Software Support

CUDA Version

No No

Clocks & Performance

Base Clock

🔥 2,150
No

Boost Clock

🔥 2,400
No

Memory Clock

🔥 +75% 2,187
1,250

Power Consumption

Recommended PSU

550 W
🔥 -18% 450 W

Power Connector

2x 8-pin 1x 6-pin

TDP/TGP

225 W
🔥 -33% 150 W

Rendering

Texture Units (TMU)

🔥 +129% 256
112

ROP

🔥 32
No

L2 Cache

🔥 16 MB
512 KB

Additional

Slots

Dual-slot Single-slot

Release Date

Oct. 12, 2022 Aug. 12, 2014

Display Outputs

1x HDMI 2.1
3x DisplayPort 2.0
4x DisplayPort 1.2

Renting is cheaper than buying