ASRock Arc A770 Challenger OC 16 GB vs EIZO MED-X70

Comparison of ASRock Arc A770 Challenger OC 16 GB with 16 GB GDDR6 and 4,096 cores vs EIZO MED-X70 with 4 GB GDDR5 and 768 cores.

Loading...

Performance Rating

ASRock Arc A770 Challenger OC 16 GB outperforms EIZO MED-X70 by 695.24% in the overall GPU ARK performance rating

A100 A100
H200 H200
MI325X MI325X

ASRock Arc A770 Challenger OC 16 GB

11.7

ASRock Arc A770 Challenger OC 16 GB

11.7
RX 7900 XTX RX 7900 XTX
MI250 MI250
Instinct MI300X Instinct MI300X

EIZO MED-X70

1.5

EIZO MED-X70

1.5

Contents:

Memory ML Performance Compute Power Architecture & Compatibility ML Software Support Clocks & Performance Power Consumption Rendering Additional

Memory

Memory Size

🔥 +300% 16 ГБ
4 GB

Memory Type

GDDR6 GDDR5

Memory Bandwidth

559.9 GB/s 96.00 GB/s

Memory Bus Width

256 бит 128 бит

ML Performance

FP16 (Half Precision)

🔥 39.32 TFLOPS
No

BF16 (Brain Float)

No No

TF32 (TensorFloat)

No No

Compute Power

FP32 (Single Precision)

🔥 +1,276% 19.66 TFLOPS
1.4285 TFLOPS

FP64 (Double Precision)

🔥 +2,653% 2.458 TFLOPS
0.0893 TFLOPS

CUDA Cores

🔥 +433% 4,096
768

RT Cores

🔥 32
No

Architecture & Compatibility

GPU Architecture

Xe-HPG GCN 2.0

SM (Streaming Multiprocessor)

No No

PCIe Version

PCIe 4.0 x16 PCIe 3.0 x16

ML Software Support

CUDA Version

No No

Clocks & Performance

Base Clock

🔥 2,150
No

Boost Clock

🔥 2,400
No

Memory Clock

🔥 +46% 2,187
1,500

Power Consumption

Recommended PSU

550 W
🔥 -55% 250 W

Power Connector

2x 8-pin None

TDP/TGP

225 W
🔥 -78% 50 W

Rendering

Texture Units (TMU)

🔥 +433% 256
48

ROP

🔥 32
No

L2 Cache

🔥 16 MB
256 KB

Additional

Slots

Dual-slot Single-slot

Release Date

Oct. 12, 2022 March 31, 2014

Display Outputs

1x HDMI 2.1
3x DisplayPort 2.0
4x DisplayPort 1.2

Renting is cheaper than buying