EIZO MED-X50LP vs Intel Arc B770

Comparison of EIZO MED-X50LP with 2 GB GDDR5 and 512 cores vs Intel Arc B770 with 16 GB GDDR6 and 4,096 cores.

Loading...

Performance Rating

Intel Arc B770 outperforms EIZO MED-X50LP by 1,354.43% in the overall GPU ARK performance rating

A100 A100
H200 H200
MI325X MI325X

EIZO MED-X50LP

0.8

EIZO MED-X50LP

0.8
RX 7900 XTX RX 7900 XTX
MI250 MI250
Instinct MI300X Instinct MI300X

Intel Arc B770

11.5

Intel Arc B770

11.5

Contents:

Memory ML Performance Compute Power Architecture & Compatibility ML Software Support Clocks & Performance Power Consumption Rendering Additional

Memory

Memory Size

2 GB
🔥 +700% 16 ГБ

Memory Type

GDDR5 GDDR6

Memory Bandwidth

64.00 GB/s 512.0 GB/s

Memory Bus Width

128 бит 256 бит

ML Performance

FP16 (Half Precision)

No
🔥 39.32 TFLOPS

BF16 (Brain Float)

No No

TF32 (TensorFloat)

No No

Compute Power

FP32 (Single Precision)

0.6451 TFLOPS
🔥 +2,948% 19.66 TFLOPS

FP64 (Double Precision)

0.0403 TFLOPS
🔥 +5,999% 2.458 TFLOPS

CUDA Cores

512
🔥 +700% 4,096

RT Cores

No
🔥 32

Architecture & Compatibility

GPU Architecture

GCN 1.0 Xe2-HPG

SM (Streaming Multiprocessor)

No No

PCIe Version

PCIe 3.0 x16 PCIe 4.0 x16

ML Software Support

CUDA Version

No No

Clocks & Performance

Base Clock

No
🔥 2,100

Boost Clock

No
🔥 2,400

Memory Clock

1,000
🔥 +100% 2,000

Power Consumption

Recommended PSU

🔥 -55% 250 W
550 W

Power Connector

None 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

TDP/TGP

🔥 -78% 50 W
225 W

Rendering

Texture Units (TMU)

32
🔥 +700% 256

ROP

No
🔥 32

L2 Cache

256 KB
🔥 16 MB

Additional

Slots

Single-slot Dual-slot

Release Date

Aug. 13, 2014 March 12, 2026

Display Outputs

4x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
1x HDMI 2.1a
3x DisplayPort 2.1

Renting is cheaper than buying