EIZO MED-X3900 vs Sapphire NITRO+ RX 7900 XTX Vapor-X

Comparison of EIZO MED-X3900 with 1,024 GB GDDR3 and 480 cores vs Sapphire NITRO+ RX 7900 XTX Vapor-X with 24 GB GDDR6 and 6,144 cores.

Loading...

Performance Rating

H200 H200
MI325X MI325X
A100 A100

EIZO MED-X3900

EIZO MED-X3900

RX 7900 XTX RX 7900 XTX
Instinct MI300X Instinct MI300X
MI250 MI250

Sapphire NITRO+ RX 7900 XTX Vapor-X

Sapphire NITRO+ RX 7900 XTX Vapor-X

Contents:

Memory ML Performance Compute Power Architecture & Compatibility ML Software Support Clocks & Performance Power Consumption Rendering Additional

Memory

Memory Size

1,024 MB 24 GB

Memory Type

GDDR3 GDDR6

Memory Bandwidth

28.80 GB/s 960.0 GB/s

Memory Bus Width

128 бит 384 бит

ML Performance

FP16 (Half Precision)

No 131.7 TFLOPS

BF16 (Brain Float)

No No

TF32 (TensorFloat)

No No

Compute Power

FP32 (Single Precision)

0.624 TFLOPS 65.86 TFLOPS

FP64 (Double Precision)

No 2.058 TFLOPS

CUDA Cores

480 6,144

RT Cores

No 96

Architecture & Compatibility

GPU Architecture

TeraScale 2 RDNA 3.0

SM (Streaming Multiprocessor)

No No

PCIe Version

PCIe 2.0 x16 PCIe 4.0 x16

ML Software Support

CUDA Version

No No

Clocks & Performance

Base Clock

No 2,119

Boost Clock

No 2,680

Memory Clock

900 2,500

Power Consumption

TDP/TGP

🔥 -88% 50 W
420 W

Recommended PSU

🔥 -69% 250 W
800 W

Power Connector

None 3x 8-pin

Rendering

Texture Units (TMU)

24 384

ROP

No 96

L2 Cache

256 KB 6 MB

Additional

Slots

Single-slot Quad-slot

Release Date

Feb. 7, 2012 Nov. 3, 2022

Display Outputs

1x DVI
1x DisplayPort 1.1
1x HDMI 2.1a
2x DisplayPort 2.1
1x USB Type-C

2x HDMI 2.1a
2x DisplayPort 2.1

Renting is cheaper than buying