ASRock Arc A770 Challenger OC 16 GB vs Dell Quadro T2000 Mobile

Comparison of ASRock Arc A770 Challenger OC 16 GB with 16 GB GDDR6 and 4,096 cores vs Dell Quadro T2000 Mobile with 4 GB GDDR5 and 1,024 cores.

Loading...

Performance Rating

ASRock Arc A770 Challenger OC 16 GB outperforms Dell Quadro T2000 Mobile by 385.06% in the overall GPU ARK performance rating

A100 A100
H200 H200
MI325X MI325X

ASRock Arc A770 Challenger OC 16 GB

11.7

ASRock Arc A770 Challenger OC 16 GB

11.7
RX 7900 XTX RX 7900 XTX
MI250 MI250
Instinct MI300X Instinct MI300X

Dell Quadro T2000 Mobile

2.4

Dell Quadro T2000 Mobile

2.4

Contents:

Memory ML Performance Compute Power Architecture & Compatibility ML Software Support Clocks & Performance Power Consumption Rendering Additional

Memory

Memory Size

🔥 +300% 16 ГБ
4 GB

Memory Type

GDDR6 GDDR5

Memory Bandwidth

559.9 GB/s 112.1 GB/s

Memory Bus Width

256 бит 128 бит

ML Performance

FP16 (Half Precision)

🔥 +493% 39.32 TFLOPS
6.636 TFLOPS

BF16 (Brain Float)

No No

TF32 (TensorFloat)

No No

Compute Power

FP32 (Single Precision)

🔥 +493% 19.66 TFLOPS
3.318 TFLOPS

FP64 (Double Precision)

🔥 +2,270% 2.458 TFLOPS
0.1037 TFLOPS

CUDA Cores

🔥 +300% 4,096
1,024

RT Cores

🔥 32
No

Architecture & Compatibility

GPU Architecture

Xe-HPG Turing

SM (Streaming Multiprocessor)

No 16

PCIe Version

PCIe 4.0 x16 PCIe 3.0 x16

ML Software Support

CUDA Version

No 7.5

Clocks & Performance

Base Clock

🔥 +79% 2,150
1,200

Boost Clock

🔥 +48% 2,400
1,620

Memory Clock

🔥 +25% 2,187
1,751

Power Consumption

Recommended PSU

550 W No

Power Connector

2x 8-pin None

TDP/TGP

225 W
🔥 -73% 60 W

Rendering

Texture Units (TMU)

🔥 +300% 256
64

ROP

🔥 32
No

L2 Cache

🔥 16 MB
1024 KB

Additional

Slots

Dual-slot IGP

Release Date

Oct. 12, 2022 May 27, 2019

Display Outputs

1x HDMI 2.1
3x DisplayPort 2.0
Portable Device Dependent

Renting is cheaper than buying