ASRock Arc A770 Challenger OC 16 GB vs Dataland RX 560D Dual Stability

Comparison of ASRock Arc A770 Challenger OC 16 GB with 16 GB GDDR6 and 4,096 cores vs Dataland RX 560D Dual Stability with 4 GB GDDR5 and 896 cores.

Loading...

Performance Rating

ASRock Arc A770 Challenger OC 16 GB outperforms Dataland RX 560D Dual Stability by 542.31% in the overall GPU ARK performance rating

A100 A100
H200 H200
MI325X MI325X

ASRock Arc A770 Challenger OC 16 GB

11.7

ASRock Arc A770 Challenger OC 16 GB

11.7
RX 7900 XTX RX 7900 XTX
MI250 MI250
Instinct MI300X Instinct MI300X

Dataland RX 560D Dual Stability

1.8

Dataland RX 560D Dual Stability

1.8

Contents:

Memory ML Performance Compute Power Architecture & Compatibility ML Software Support Clocks & Performance Power Consumption Rendering Additional

Memory

Memory Size

🔥 +300% 16 ГБ
4 GB

Memory Type

GDDR6 GDDR5

Memory Bandwidth

559.9 GB/s 96.00 GB/s

Memory Bus Width

256 бит 128 бит

ML Performance

FP16 (Half Precision)

🔥 +1,767% 39.32 TFLOPS
2.106 TFLOPS

BF16 (Brain Float)

No No

TF32 (TensorFloat)

No No

Compute Power

FP32 (Single Precision)

🔥 +834% 19.66 TFLOPS
2.106 TFLOPS

FP64 (Double Precision)

🔥 +1,768% 2.458 TFLOPS
0.1316 TFLOPS

CUDA Cores

🔥 +357% 4,096
896

RT Cores

🔥 32
No

Architecture & Compatibility

GPU Architecture

Xe-HPG GCN 4.0

SM (Streaming Multiprocessor)

No No

PCIe Version

PCIe 4.0 x16 PCIe 3.0 x8

ML Software Support

CUDA Version

No No

Clocks & Performance

Base Clock

🔥 +97% 2,150
1,090

Boost Clock

🔥 +104% 2,400
1,175

Memory Clock

🔥 +46% 2,187
1,500

Power Consumption

Recommended PSU

550 W
🔥 -55% 250 W

Power Connector

2x 8-pin 1x 6-pin

TDP/TGP

225 W
🔥 -71% 65 W

Rendering

Texture Units (TMU)

🔥 +357% 256
56

ROP

🔥 32
No

L2 Cache

🔥 16 MB
1024 KB

Additional

Slots

Dual-slot Dual-slot

Release Date

Oct. 12, 2022 July 4, 2017

Display Outputs

1x HDMI 2.1
3x DisplayPort 2.0
1x DVI
1x HDMI 2.0b
1x DisplayPort 1.4a

1x DVI

Renting is cheaper than buying