Compal 9600M GT vs Matrox D1480 Quad DisplayPort

Comparison of Compal 9600M GT with 512 GB GDDR3 and 32 cores vs Matrox D1480 Quad DisplayPort with 4 GB GDDR5 and 512 cores.

Loading...

Performance Rating

Matrox D1480 Quad DisplayPort outperforms Compal 9600M GT by 206.25% in the overall GPU ARK performance rating

A100 A100
H200 H200
MI325X MI325X

Compal 9600M GT

0.5

Compal 9600M GT

0.5
RX 7900 XTX RX 7900 XTX
MI250 MI250
Instinct MI300X Instinct MI300X

Matrox D1480 Quad DisplayPort

1.5

Matrox D1480 Quad DisplayPort

1.5

Contents:

Memory ML Performance Compute Power Architecture & Compatibility ML Software Support Clocks & Performance Power Consumption Rendering Additional

Memory

Memory Size

512 MB
🔥 4 ГБ

Memory Type

GDDR3 GDDR5

Memory Bandwidth

25.34 GB/s 96.13 GB/s

Memory Bus Width

128 бит 128 бит

ML Performance

FP16 (Half Precision)

No
🔥 0.0223 TFLOPS

BF16 (Brain Float)

No No

TF32 (TensorFloat)

No No

Compute Power

FP32 (Single Precision)

0.08 TFLOPS
🔥 +1,682% 1.4254 TFLOPS

FP64 (Double Precision)

No
🔥 0.0445 TFLOPS

CUDA Cores

32
🔥 +1,500% 512

RT Cores

No No

Architecture & Compatibility

GPU Architecture

Tesla Pascal

SM (Streaming Multiprocessor)

4
🔥 4

PCIe Version

MXM-II PCIe 3.0 x16

ML Software Support

CUDA Version

1.1
🔥 6.1

Clocks & Performance

Base Clock

No
🔥 1,354

Boost Clock

No
🔥 1,392

Memory Clock

792
🔥 +90% 1,502

Power Consumption

Recommended PSU

No 200 W

Power Connector

None None

TDP/TGP

🔥 -51% 23 W
47 W

Rendering

Texture Units (TMU)

16
🔥 +100% 32

ROP

No No

L2 Cache

32 KB
🔥 +3,100% 1024 KB

Additional

Slots

MXM Module Single-slot

Release Date

June 4, 2008 May 21, 2020

Display Outputs

Portable Device Dependent
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
4x DisplayPort 1.4a

Renting is cheaper than buying