CLEVO GTX 950M 2 GB vs NVIDIA RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF

Comparison of CLEVO GTX 950M 2 GB with 2 GB GDDR5 and 640 cores vs NVIDIA RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF with 24 GB GDDR7 and 8,960 cores.

Loading...

Performance Rating

NVIDIA RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF outperforms CLEVO GTX 950M 2 GB by 1,128.7% in the overall GPU ARK performance rating

A100 A100
H200 H200
MI325X MI325X

CLEVO GTX 950M 2 GB

1.1

CLEVO GTX 950M 2 GB

1.1
RX 7900 XTX RX 7900 XTX
MI250 MI250
Instinct MI300X Instinct MI300X

NVIDIA RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF

13.3

NVIDIA RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF

13.3

Contents:

Memory ML Performance Compute Power Architecture & Compatibility ML Software Support Clocks & Performance Power Consumption Rendering Additional

Memory

Memory Size

2 GB
🔥 +1,100% 24 ГБ

Memory Type

GDDR5 GDDR7

Memory Bandwidth

57.60 GB/s 432.0 GB/s

Memory Bus Width

128 бит 192 бит

ML Performance

FP16 (Half Precision)

No
🔥 25.66 TFLOPS

BF16 (Brain Float)

No No

TF32 (TensorFloat)

No No

Compute Power

FP32 (Single Precision)

1.1878 TFLOPS
🔥 +2,060% 25.66 TFLOPS

FP64 (Double Precision)

0.0371 TFLOPS
🔥 +981% 0.401 TFLOPS

CUDA Cores

640
🔥 +1,300% 8,960

RT Cores

No
🔥 70

Architecture & Compatibility

GPU Architecture

Maxwell Blackwell 2.0

SM (Streaming Multiprocessor)

No
🔥 70

PCIe Version

PCIe 3.0 x8 PCIe 5.0 x8

ML Software Support

CUDA Version

5.0
🔥 12.0

Clocks & Performance

Base Clock

915
🔥 577

Boost Clock

928
🔥 +54% 1,432

Memory Clock

900
🔥 +25% 1,125

Power Consumption

Recommended PSU

No 250 W

Power Connector

None None

TDP/TGP

75 W
🔥 -7% 70 W

Rendering

Texture Units (TMU)

40
🔥 +600% 280

ROP

No
🔥 70

L2 Cache

2 MB
🔥 +2,300% 48 MB

Additional

Slots

IGP Dual-slot

Release Date

March 13, 2015 Aug. 11, 2025

Display Outputs

Portable Device Dependent
4x mini-DisplayPort 2.1b

Renting is cheaper than buying