CLEVO GTX 680M Boost vs Intel Arc B770

Comparison of CLEVO GTX 680M Boost with 4 GB GDDR5 and 1,344 cores vs Intel Arc B770 with 16 GB GDDR6 and 4,096 cores.

Loading...

Performance Rating

Intel Arc B770 outperforms CLEVO GTX 680M Boost by 477.39% in the overall GPU ARK performance rating

A100 A100
H200 H200
MI325X MI325X

CLEVO GTX 680M Boost

2.0

CLEVO GTX 680M Boost

2.0
RX 7900 XTX RX 7900 XTX
MI250 MI250
Instinct MI300X Instinct MI300X

Intel Arc B770

11.5

Intel Arc B770

11.5

Contents:

Memory ML Performance Compute Power Architecture & Compatibility ML Software Support Clocks & Performance Power Consumption Rendering Additional

Memory

Memory Size

4 GB
🔥 +300% 16 ГБ

Memory Type

GDDR5 GDDR6

Memory Bandwidth

115.2 GB/s 512.0 GB/s

Memory Bus Width

256 бит 256 бит

ML Performance

FP16 (Half Precision)

No
🔥 39.32 TFLOPS

BF16 (Brain Float)

No No

TF32 (TensorFloat)

No No

Compute Power

FP32 (Single Precision)

2.038 TFLOPS
🔥 +865% 19.66 TFLOPS

FP64 (Double Precision)

0.0849 TFLOPS
🔥 +2,795% 2.458 TFLOPS

CUDA Cores

1,344
🔥 +205% 4,096

RT Cores

No
🔥 32

Architecture & Compatibility

GPU Architecture

Kepler Xe2-HPG

SM (Streaming Multiprocessor)

No No

PCIe Version

MXM-B (3.0) PCIe 4.0 x16

ML Software Support

CUDA Version

3.0 No

Clocks & Performance

Base Clock

719
🔥 +192% 2,100

Boost Clock

758
🔥 +217% 2,400

Memory Clock

900
🔥 +122% 2,000

Power Consumption

Recommended PSU

No 550 W

Power Connector

None 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

TDP/TGP

🔥 -56% 100 W
225 W

Rendering

Texture Units (TMU)

112
🔥 +129% 256

ROP

No
🔥 32

L2 Cache

512 KB
🔥 16 MB

Additional

Slots

MXM Module Dual-slot

Release Date

June 4, 2012 March 12, 2026

Display Outputs

Portable Device Dependent
1x HDMI 2.1a
3x DisplayPort 2.1

Renting is cheaper than buying