ASRock Arc A770 Challenger OC 16 GB vs XFX BC-160

Comparison of ASRock Arc A770 Challenger OC 16 GB with 16 GB GDDR6 and 4,096 cores vs XFX BC-160 with 8 GB HBM2 and 2,304 cores.

Loading...

Performance Rating

ASRock Arc A770 Challenger OC 16 GB outperforms XFX BC-160 by 57.34% in the overall GPU ARK performance rating

A100 A100
H200 H200
MI325X MI325X

ASRock Arc A770 Challenger OC 16 GB

11.7

ASRock Arc A770 Challenger OC 16 GB

11.7
RX 7900 XTX RX 7900 XTX
MI250 MI250
Instinct MI300X Instinct MI300X

XFX BC-160

7.4

XFX BC-160

7.4

Contents:

Memory ML Performance Compute Power Architecture & Compatibility ML Software Support Clocks & Performance Power Consumption Rendering Additional

Memory

Memory Size

🔥 +100% 16 ГБ
8 GB

Memory Type

GDDR6 HBM2

Memory Bandwidth

559.9 GB/s 512.0 GB/s

Memory Bus Width

256 бит 2,048 бит

ML Performance

FP16 (Half Precision)

🔥 +167% 39.32 TFLOPS
14.75 TFLOPS

BF16 (Brain Float)

No No

TF32 (TensorFloat)

No No

Compute Power

FP32 (Single Precision)

🔥 +167% 19.66 TFLOPS
7.373 TFLOPS

FP64 (Double Precision)

🔥 +433% 2.458 TFLOPS
0.4608 TFLOPS

CUDA Cores

🔥 +78% 4,096
2,304

RT Cores

🔥 32
No

Architecture & Compatibility

GPU Architecture

Xe-HPG RDNA 1.0

SM (Streaming Multiprocessor)

No No

PCIe Version

PCIe 4.0 x16 PCIe 4.0 x16

ML Software Support

CUDA Version

No No

Clocks & Performance

Base Clock

🔥 +115% 2,150
1,000

Boost Clock

🔥 +50% 2,400
1,600

Memory Clock

🔥 +119% 2,187
1,000

Power Consumption

Recommended PSU

550 W
🔥 -18% 450 W

Power Connector

2x 8-pin 2x 8-pin

TDP/TGP

225 W
🔥 -33% 150 W

Rendering

Texture Units (TMU)

🔥 +78% 256
144

ROP

🔥 32
No

L2 Cache

16 MB
🔥 4 MB

Additional

Slots

Dual-slot Dual-slot

Release Date

Oct. 12, 2022 Dec. 13, 2021

Display Outputs

1x HDMI 2.1
3x DisplayPort 2.0
No outputs

Renting is cheaper than buying