ASRock Arc A770 Challenger OC 16 GB vs NVIDIA Tesla S2050

Comparison of ASRock Arc A770 Challenger OC 16 GB with 16 GB GDDR6 and 4,096 cores vs NVIDIA Tesla S2050 with 3 GB GDDR5 and 448 cores.

Loading...

Performance Rating

ASRock Arc A770 Challenger OC 16 GB outperforms NVIDIA Tesla S2050 by 591.72% in the overall GPU ARK performance rating

A100 A100
H200 H200
MI325X MI325X

ASRock Arc A770 Challenger OC 16 GB

11.7

ASRock Arc A770 Challenger OC 16 GB

11.7
RX 7900 XTX RX 7900 XTX
MI250 MI250
Instinct MI300X Instinct MI300X

NVIDIA Tesla S2050

1.7

NVIDIA Tesla S2050

1.7

Contents:

Memory ML Performance Compute Power Architecture & Compatibility ML Software Support Clocks & Performance Power Consumption Rendering Additional

Memory

Memory Size

🔥 +433% 16 ГБ
3 GB ×4 (12 ГБ)

Memory Type

GDDR6 GDDR5

Memory Bandwidth

559.9 GB/s 148.4 GB/s ×4 (593.6 GB/s)

Memory Bus Width

256 бит 384 бит ×4 (1536 бит)

ML Performance

FP16 (Half Precision)

🔥 39.32 TFLOPS
No

BF16 (Brain Float)

No No

TF32 (TensorFloat)

No No

Compute Power

FP32 (Single Precision)

🔥 +1,813% 19.66 TFLOPS
1.0277 TFLOPS

FP64 (Double Precision)

🔥 +378% 2.458 TFLOPS
0.5139 TFLOPS

CUDA Cores

🔥 +814% 4,096
448 ×4 (1792)

RT Cores

🔥 32
No

Architecture & Compatibility

GPU Architecture

Xe-HPG Fermi

SM (Streaming Multiprocessor)

No 14

PCIe Version

PCIe 4.0 x16 PCIe 2.0 x16

ML Software Support

CUDA Version

No 2.0

Clocks & Performance

Base Clock

🔥 2,150
No

Boost Clock

🔥 2,400
No

Memory Clock

🔥 +183% 2,187
773

Power Consumption

Recommended PSU

🔥 -58% 550 W
1300 W

Power Connector

2x 8-pin No

TDP/TGP

🔥 -75% 225 W
900 W

Rendering

Texture Units (TMU)

🔥 +357% 256
56 ×4 (224)

ROP

🔥 32
No

L2 Cache

🔥 16 MB
768 KB

Additional

Slots

Dual-slot Dual-slot

Release Date

Oct. 12, 2022 July 25, 2011

Display Outputs

1x HDMI 2.1
3x DisplayPort 2.0
No outputs

Renting is cheaper than buying