ASRock Arc A770 Challenger OC 16 GB vs NVIDIA Tesla K20Xm

Comparison of ASRock Arc A770 Challenger OC 16 GB with 16 GB GDDR6 and 4,096 cores vs NVIDIA Tesla K20Xm with 6 GB GDDR5 and 2,688 cores.

Loading...

Performance Rating

ASRock Arc A770 Challenger OC 16 GB outperforms NVIDIA Tesla K20Xm by 216.8% in the overall GPU ARK performance rating

A100 A100
H200 H200
MI325X MI325X

ASRock Arc A770 Challenger OC 16 GB

11.7

ASRock Arc A770 Challenger OC 16 GB

11.7
RX 7900 XTX RX 7900 XTX
MI250 MI250
Instinct MI300X Instinct MI300X

NVIDIA Tesla K20Xm

3.7

NVIDIA Tesla K20Xm

3.7

Contents:

Memory ML Performance Compute Power Architecture & Compatibility ML Software Support Clocks & Performance Power Consumption Rendering Additional

Memory

Memory Size

🔥 +167% 16 ГБ
6 GB

Memory Type

GDDR6 GDDR5

Memory Bandwidth

559.9 GB/s 249.6 GB/s

Memory Bus Width

256 бит 384 бит

ML Performance

FP16 (Half Precision)

🔥 39.32 TFLOPS
No

BF16 (Brain Float)

No No

TF32 (TensorFloat)

No No

Compute Power

FP32 (Single Precision)

🔥 +400% 19.66 TFLOPS
3.935 TFLOPS

FP64 (Double Precision)

🔥 +87% 2.458 TFLOPS
1.3117 TFLOPS

CUDA Cores

🔥 +52% 4,096
2,688

RT Cores

🔥 32
No

Architecture & Compatibility

GPU Architecture

Xe-HPG Kepler

SM (Streaming Multiprocessor)

No No

PCIe Version

PCIe 4.0 x16 PCIe 3.0 x16

ML Software Support

CUDA Version

No 3.5

Clocks & Performance

Base Clock

🔥 2,150
No

Boost Clock

🔥 2,400
No

Memory Clock

🔥 +68% 2,187
1,300

Power Consumption

Recommended PSU

550 W 550 W

Power Connector

2x 8-pin No

TDP/TGP

🔥 -4% 225 W
235 W

Rendering

Texture Units (TMU)

🔥 +14% 256
224

ROP

🔥 32
No

L2 Cache

🔥 16 MB
1536 KB

Additional

Slots

Dual-slot Dual-slot

Release Date

Oct. 12, 2022 Nov. 12, 2012

Display Outputs

1x HDMI 2.1
3x DisplayPort 2.0
No outputs

Renting is cheaper than buying