ASRock Arc A770 Challenger OC 16 GB vs NVIDIA T400 4 GB

Comparison of ASRock Arc A770 Challenger OC 16 GB with 16 GB GDDR6 and 4,096 cores vs NVIDIA T400 4 GB with 4 GB GDDR6 and 384 cores.

Loading...

Performance Rating

ASRock Arc A770 Challenger OC 16 GB outperforms NVIDIA T400 4 GB by 925.44% in the overall GPU ARK performance rating

A100 A100
H200 H200
MI325X MI325X

ASRock Arc A770 Challenger OC 16 GB

11.7

ASRock Arc A770 Challenger OC 16 GB

11.7
RX 7900 XTX RX 7900 XTX
MI250 MI250
Instinct MI300X Instinct MI300X

NVIDIA T400 4 GB

1.1

NVIDIA T400 4 GB

1.1

Contents:

Memory ML Performance Compute Power Architecture & Compatibility ML Software Support Clocks & Performance Power Consumption Rendering Additional

Memory

Memory Size

🔥 +300% 16 ГБ
4 GB

Memory Type

GDDR6 GDDR6

Memory Bandwidth

559.9 GB/s 80.00 GB/s

Memory Bus Width

256 бит 64 бит

ML Performance

FP16 (Half Precision)

🔥 +1,696% 39.32 TFLOPS
2.189 TFLOPS

BF16 (Brain Float)

No No

TF32 (TensorFloat)

No No

Compute Power

FP32 (Single Precision)

🔥 +1,696% 19.66 TFLOPS
1.0944 TFLOPS

FP64 (Double Precision)

🔥 +7,087% 2.458 TFLOPS
0.0342 TFLOPS

CUDA Cores

🔥 +967% 4,096
384

RT Cores

🔥 32
No

Architecture & Compatibility

GPU Architecture

Xe-HPG Turing

SM (Streaming Multiprocessor)

No
🔥 6

PCIe Version

PCIe 4.0 x16 PCIe 3.0 x16

ML Software Support

CUDA Version

No 7.5

Clocks & Performance

Base Clock

🔥 +412% 2,150
420

Boost Clock

🔥 +68% 2,400
1,425

Memory Clock

🔥 +75% 2,187
1,250

Power Consumption

Recommended PSU

550 W
🔥 -64% 200 W

Power Connector

2x 8-pin None

TDP/TGP

225 W
🔥 -87% 30 W

Rendering

Texture Units (TMU)

🔥 +967% 256
24

ROP

🔥 32
No

L2 Cache

🔥 16 MB
1024 KB

Additional

Slots

Dual-slot Single-slot

Release Date

Oct. 12, 2022 May 6, 2021

Display Outputs

1x HDMI 2.1
3x DisplayPort 2.0
3x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a

Renting is cheaper than buying