ASRock Arc A770 Challenger OC 16 GB vs NVIDIA Quadro P620

Comparison ASRock Arc A770 Challenger OC 16 GB with 16 GB GDDR6 and 4,096 cores vs NVIDIA Quadro P620 with 2 GB GDDR5 and 512 cores.

Loading...

Performance Rating

ASRock Arc A770 Challenger OC 16 GB outperforms NVIDIA Quadro P620 by 827.78% in the overall GPU ARK performance rating

A100 A100
H200 H200
MI325X MI325X

ASRock Arc A770 Challenger OC 16 GB

11.7

ASRock Arc A770 Challenger OC 16 GB

11.7
RX 7900 XTX RX 7900 XTX
MI250 MI250
Instinct MI300X Instinct MI300X

NVIDIA Quadro P620

1.3

NVIDIA Quadro P620

1.3

Expert Comparison

ASRock Arc A770 Challenger OC 16 GB значительно выигрывает по мощности и производительности: имеет больше ядер, большую память и более высокую пропускную способность. Она идеальна для гейминга и средней степени графической обработки. NVIDIA Quadro P620 слабее по всем параметрам, подходит только для базовых задач, таких как офисная работа и простая визуализация.

Contents:

Memory ML Performance Compute Power Architecture & Compatibility ML Software Support Clocks & Performance Power Consumption Rendering Benchmarks Additional

Memory

Memory Size

🔥 +700% 16 ГБ
2 GB

Memory Type

GDDR6 GDDR5

Memory Bandwidth

559.9 GB/s 80.13 GB/s

Memory Bus Width

256 бит 128 бит

ML Performance

FP16 (Half Precision)

🔥 +181,098% 39.32 TFLOPS
0.0217 TFLOPS

BF16 (Brain Float)

No No

TF32 (TensorFloat)

No No

Compute Power

FP32 (Single Precision)

🔥 +1,318% 19.66 TFLOPS
1.3865 TFLOPS

FP64 (Double Precision)

🔥 +5,577% 2.458 TFLOPS
0.0433 TFLOPS

CUDA Cores

🔥 +700% 4,096
512

RT Cores

🔥 32
No

Architecture & Compatibility

GPU Architecture

Xe-HPG Pascal

SM (Streaming Multiprocessor)

No 4

PCIe Version

PCIe 4.0 x16 PCIe 3.0 x16

ML Software Support

CUDA Version

No 6.1

CUDA Toolkit (first supported)

v8

CUDA Toolkit (deprecated)

v12

CUDA Toolkit (support removed)

v13

CUDA Toolkit status

Supported Removed

Clocks & Performance

Base Clock

🔥 +70% 2,150
1,266

Boost Clock

🔥 +77% 2,400
1,354

Memory Clock

🔥 +75% 2,187
1,252

Power Consumption

Recommended PSU

550 W
🔥 -64% 200 W

Power Connector

2x 8-pin None

TDP/TGP

225 W
🔥 -82% 40 W

Rendering

Texture Units (TMU)

🔥 +700% 256
32

ROP

🔥 32
No

L2 Cache

🔥 16 MB
1024 KB

Benchmarks

llama.cpp, llama-2-7b-Q4_0

74.7 tokens/s

Additional

Slots

Dual-slot Single-slot

Release Date

Oct. 12, 2022 Feb. 1, 2018

Display Outputs

1x HDMI 2.1
3x DisplayPort 2.0
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a

Renting is cheaper than buying