ASRock Arc A770 Challenger OC 16 GB vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 4800 Mac Edition

Comparison of ASRock Arc A770 Challenger OC 16 GB with 16 GB GDDR6 and 4,096 cores vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 4800 Mac Edition with 1,536 GB GDDR3 and 192 cores.

Loading...

Performance Rating

ASRock Arc A770 Challenger OC 16 GB outperforms NVIDIA Quadro FX 4800 Mac Edition by 467.48% in the overall GPU ARK performance rating

A100 A100
H200 H200
MI325X MI325X

ASRock Arc A770 Challenger OC 16 GB

11.7

ASRock Arc A770 Challenger OC 16 GB

11.7
RX 7900 XTX RX 7900 XTX
MI250 MI250
Instinct MI300X Instinct MI300X

NVIDIA Quadro FX 4800 Mac Edition

2.1

NVIDIA Quadro FX 4800 Mac Edition

2.1

Contents:

Memory ML Performance Compute Power Architecture & Compatibility ML Software Support Clocks & Performance Power Consumption Rendering Additional

Memory

Memory Size

🔥 16 ГБ
1,536 MB

Memory Type

GDDR6 GDDR3

Memory Bandwidth

559.9 GB/s 76.80 GB/s

Memory Bus Width

256 бит 384 бит

ML Performance

FP16 (Half Precision)

🔥 39.32 TFLOPS
No

BF16 (Brain Float)

No No

TF32 (TensorFloat)

No No

Compute Power

FP32 (Single Precision)

🔥 +4,153% 19.66 TFLOPS
0.4623 TFLOPS

FP64 (Double Precision)

🔥 +4,153% 2.458 TFLOPS
0.0578 TFLOPS

CUDA Cores

🔥 +2,033% 4,096
192

RT Cores

🔥 32
No

Architecture & Compatibility

GPU Architecture

Xe-HPG Tesla 2.0

SM (Streaming Multiprocessor)

No 24

PCIe Version

PCIe 4.0 x16 PCIe 2.0 x16

ML Software Support

CUDA Version

No 1.3

Clocks & Performance

Base Clock

🔥 2,150
No

Boost Clock

🔥 2,400
No

Memory Clock

🔥 +173% 2,187
800

Power Consumption

Recommended PSU

550 W
🔥 -18% 450 W

Power Connector

2x 8-pin 1x 6-pin

TDP/TGP

225 W
🔥 -33% 150 W

Rendering

Texture Units (TMU)

🔥 +300% 256
64

ROP

🔥 32
No

L2 Cache

🔥 16 MB
192 KB

Additional

Slots

Dual-slot Dual-slot

Release Date

Oct. 12, 2022 Nov. 11, 2008

Display Outputs

1x HDMI 2.1
3x DisplayPort 2.0
2x DVI
1x S-Video

Renting is cheaper than buying