ASRock Arc A770 Challenger OC 16 GB vs NVIDIA Quadro 3000M X2

Comparison of ASRock Arc A770 Challenger OC 16 GB with 16 GB GDDR6 and 4,096 cores vs NVIDIA Quadro 3000M X2 with 2 GB GDDR5 and 240 cores.

Loading...

Performance Rating

ASRock Arc A770 Challenger OC 16 GB outperforms NVIDIA Quadro 3000M X2 by 1,458.67% in the overall GPU ARK performance rating

A100 A100
H200 H200
MI325X MI325X

ASRock Arc A770 Challenger OC 16 GB

11.7

ASRock Arc A770 Challenger OC 16 GB

11.7
RX 7900 XTX RX 7900 XTX
MI250 MI250
Instinct MI300X Instinct MI300X

NVIDIA Quadro 3000M X2

0.8

NVIDIA Quadro 3000M X2

0.8

Contents:

Memory ML Performance Compute Power Architecture & Compatibility ML Software Support Clocks & Performance Power Consumption Rendering Additional

Memory

Memory Size

🔥 +700% 16 ГБ
2 GB ×2 (4 ГБ)

Memory Type

GDDR6 GDDR5

Memory Bandwidth

559.9 GB/s 80.00 GB/s ×2 (160 GB/s)

Memory Bus Width

256 бит 256 бит ×2 (512 бит)

ML Performance

FP16 (Half Precision)

🔥 39.32 TFLOPS
No

BF16 (Brain Float)

No No

TF32 (TensorFloat)

No No

Compute Power

FP32 (Single Precision)

🔥 +4,451% 19.66 TFLOPS
0.432 TFLOPS

FP64 (Double Precision)

🔥 +6,728% 2.458 TFLOPS
0.036 TFLOPS

CUDA Cores

🔥 +1,607% 4,096
240 ×2 (480)

RT Cores

🔥 32
No

Architecture & Compatibility

GPU Architecture

Xe-HPG Fermi

SM (Streaming Multiprocessor)

No 5

PCIe Version

PCIe 4.0 x16 MXM-B (3.0)

ML Software Support

CUDA Version

No 2.1

Clocks & Performance

Base Clock

🔥 2,150
No

Boost Clock

🔥 2,400
No

Memory Clock

🔥 +250% 2,187
625

Power Consumption

Recommended PSU

550 W No

Power Connector

2x 8-pin None

TDP/TGP

225 W
🔥 -33% 150 W

Rendering

Texture Units (TMU)

🔥 +540% 256
40 ×2 (80)

ROP

🔥 32
No

L2 Cache

🔥 16 MB
512 KB

Additional

Slots

Dual-slot MXM Module

Release Date

Oct. 12, 2022 Feb. 22, 2011

Display Outputs

1x HDMI 2.1
3x DisplayPort 2.0
Portable Device Dependent

Renting is cheaper than buying