ASRock Arc A770 Challenger OC 16 GB vs NVIDIA GeForce2 MX 200 LP

Comparison ASRock Arc A770 Challenger OC 16 GB with 16 GB GDDR6 and 4,096 cores vs NVIDIA GeForce2 MX 200 LP with 32 GB SDR.

Loading...

Performance Rating

A100 A100
H200 H200
MI325X MI325X

ASRock Arc A770 Challenger OC 16 GB

11.7

ASRock Arc A770 Challenger OC 16 GB

11.7
RX 7900 XTX RX 7900 XTX
MI250 MI250
Instinct MI300X Instinct MI300X

NVIDIA GeForce2 MX 200 LP

NVIDIA GeForce2 MX 200 LP

Expert Comparison

ASRock Arc A770 Challenger OC 16 GB значительно превосходит NVIDIA GeForce2 MX 200 LP по всем параметрам. Она имеет большее количество ядер, больше оперативной памяти и гораздо большую пропускную способность. А770 идеальна для современных игр и приложений, в то время как GeForce2 MX 200 LP устарел и непригоден для современного использования.

Contents:

Memory ML Performance Compute Power Architecture & Compatibility ML Software Support Clocks & Performance Power Consumption Rendering Additional

Memory

Memory Size

🔥 16 ГБ
32 MB

Memory Type

GDDR6 SDR

Memory Bandwidth

559.9 GB/s 1.328 GB/s

Memory Bus Width

256 бит 64 бит

ML Performance

FP16 (Half Precision)

🔥 39.32 TFLOPS
No

BF16 (Brain Float)

No No

TF32 (TensorFloat)

No No

Compute Power

FP32 (Single Precision)

🔥 19.66 TFLOPS
No

FP64 (Double Precision)

🔥 2.458 TFLOPS
No

CUDA Cores

🔥 4,096
No

RT Cores

🔥 32
No

Architecture & Compatibility

GPU Architecture

Xe-HPG Celsius

SM (Streaming Multiprocessor)

No No

PCIe Version

PCIe 4.0 x16 AGP 4x

ML Software Support

CUDA Version

No No

CUDA Toolkit status

Supported Supported

Clocks & Performance

Base Clock

🔥 2,150
No

Boost Clock

🔥 2,400
No

Memory Clock

🔥 +1,217% 2,187
166

Power Consumption

Recommended PSU

550 W
🔥 -64% 200 W

Power Connector

2x 8-pin None

TDP/TGP

225 W unknown

Rendering

Texture Units (TMU)

🔥 +6,300% 256
4

ROP

🔥 32
No

L2 Cache

🔥 16 MB
No

Additional

Slots

Dual-slot Single-slot

Release Date

Oct. 12, 2022 March 3, 2001

Display Outputs

1x HDMI 2.1
3x DisplayPort 2.0
1x VGA

Renting is cheaper than buying