ASRock Arc A770 Challenger OC 16 GB vs NVIDIA GeForce 6500

Comparison ASRock Arc A770 Challenger OC 16 GB with 16 GB GDDR6 and 4,096 cores vs NVIDIA GeForce 6500 with 128 GB DDR2.

Loading...

Performance Rating

A100 A100
H200 H200
MI325X MI325X

ASRock Arc A770 Challenger OC 16 GB

11.7

ASRock Arc A770 Challenger OC 16 GB

11.7
RX 7900 XTX RX 7900 XTX
MI250 MI250
Instinct MI300X Instinct MI300X

NVIDIA GeForce 6500

NVIDIA GeForce 6500

Expert Comparison

ASRock Arc A770 Challenger OC 16 GB значительно превосходит NVIDIA GeForce 6500 по многим параметрам. Она имеет больше ядер, большую память и шину, а также гораздо более высокую пропускную способность и GPU Performance Index. A770 идеальна для современных игр и тяжелых приложений, в то время как GeForce 6500 устарел и не подходит для современных задач.

Contents:

Memory ML Performance Compute Power Architecture & Compatibility ML Software Support Clocks & Performance Power Consumption Rendering Additional

Memory

Memory Size

🔥 16 ГБ
128 MB

Memory Type

GDDR6 DDR2

Memory Bandwidth

559.9 GB/s 8.512 GB/s

Memory Bus Width

256 бит 128 бит

ML Performance

FP16 (Half Precision)

🔥 39.32 TFLOPS
No

BF16 (Brain Float)

No No

TF32 (TensorFloat)

No No

Compute Power

FP32 (Single Precision)

🔥 19.66 TFLOPS
No

FP64 (Double Precision)

🔥 2.458 TFLOPS
No

CUDA Cores

🔥 4,096
No

RT Cores

🔥 32
No

Architecture & Compatibility

GPU Architecture

Xe-HPG Curie

SM (Streaming Multiprocessor)

No No

PCIe Version

PCIe 4.0 x16 PCIe 1.0 x16

ML Software Support

CUDA Version

No No

CUDA Toolkit status

Supported Supported

Clocks & Performance

Base Clock

🔥 2,150
No

Boost Clock

🔥 2,400
No

Memory Clock

🔥 +722% 2,187
266

Power Consumption

Recommended PSU

550 W
🔥 -64% 200 W

Power Connector

2x 8-pin No

TDP/TGP

225 W unknown

Rendering

Texture Units (TMU)

🔥 +6,300% 256
4

ROP

🔥 32
No

L2 Cache

🔥 16 MB
No

Additional

Slots

Dual-slot Single-slot

Release Date

Oct. 12, 2022 Oct. 1, 2005

Display Outputs

1x HDMI 2.1
3x DisplayPort 2.0
1x DVI
1x VGA
1x S-Video

Renting is cheaper than buying