ASRock Arc A770 Challenger OC 16 GB vs EIZO Condor GR5-A2000 3U VPX 8 GB

Comparison of ASRock Arc A770 Challenger OC 16 GB with 16 GB GDDR6 and 4,096 cores vs EIZO Condor GR5-A2000 3U VPX 8 GB with 8 GB GDDR6 and 2,560 cores.

Loading...

Performance Rating

ASRock Arc A770 Challenger OC 16 GB outperforms EIZO Condor GR5-A2000 3U VPX 8 GB by 122.24% in the overall GPU ARK performance rating

A100 A100
H200 H200
MI325X MI325X

ASRock Arc A770 Challenger OC 16 GB

11.7

ASRock Arc A770 Challenger OC 16 GB

11.7
RX 7900 XTX RX 7900 XTX
MI250 MI250
Instinct MI300X Instinct MI300X

EIZO Condor GR5-A2000 3U VPX 8 GB

5.3

EIZO Condor GR5-A2000 3U VPX 8 GB

5.3

Contents:

Memory ML Performance Compute Power Architecture & Compatibility ML Software Support Clocks & Performance Power Consumption Rendering Additional

Memory

Memory Size

🔥 +100% 16 ГБ
8 GB

Memory Type

GDDR6 GDDR6

Memory Bandwidth

559.9 GB/s 192.0 GB/s

Memory Bus Width

256 бит 128 бит

ML Performance

FP16 (Half Precision)

🔥 +323% 39.32 TFLOPS
9.293 TFLOPS

BF16 (Brain Float)

No No

TF32 (TensorFloat)

No No

Compute Power

FP32 (Single Precision)

🔥 +112% 19.66 TFLOPS
9.293 TFLOPS

FP64 (Double Precision)

🔥 +1,593% 2.458 TFLOPS
0.1452 TFLOPS

CUDA Cores

🔥 +60% 4,096
2,560

RT Cores

🔥 +60% 32
20

Architecture & Compatibility

GPU Architecture

Xe-HPG Ampere

SM (Streaming Multiprocessor)

No
🔥 20

PCIe Version

PCIe 4.0 x16 PCIe 4.0 x8

ML Software Support

CUDA Version

No 8.6

Clocks & Performance

Base Clock

🔥 +55% 2,150
1,387

Boost Clock

🔥 +32% 2,400
1,815

Memory Clock

🔥 +46% 2,187
1,500

Power Consumption

Recommended PSU

550 W No

Power Connector

2x 8-pin None

TDP/TGP

225 W
🔥 -73% 60 W

Rendering

Texture Units (TMU)

🔥 +220% 256
80

ROP

🔥 +60% 32
20

L2 Cache

16 MB
🔥 2 MB

Additional

Slots

Dual-slot MXM Module

Release Date

Oct. 12, 2022 March 30, 2022

Display Outputs

1x HDMI 2.1
3x DisplayPort 2.0
Portable Device Dependent

Renting is cheaper than buying