ASRock Arc A770 Challenger OC 16 GB vs CLEVO GTX 950M 2 GB

Comparison of ASRock Arc A770 Challenger OC 16 GB with 16 GB GDDR6 and 4,096 cores vs CLEVO GTX 950M 2 GB with 2 GB GDDR5 and 640 cores.

Loading...

Performance Rating

ASRock Arc A770 Challenger OC 16 GB outperforms CLEVO GTX 950M 2 GB by 982.41% in the overall GPU ARK performance rating

A100 A100
H200 H200
MI325X MI325X

ASRock Arc A770 Challenger OC 16 GB

11.7

ASRock Arc A770 Challenger OC 16 GB

11.7
RX 7900 XTX RX 7900 XTX
MI250 MI250
Instinct MI300X Instinct MI300X

CLEVO GTX 950M 2 GB

1.1

CLEVO GTX 950M 2 GB

1.1

Contents:

Memory ML Performance Compute Power Architecture & Compatibility ML Software Support Clocks & Performance Power Consumption Rendering Additional

Memory

Memory Size

🔥 +700% 16 ГБ
2 GB

Memory Type

GDDR6 GDDR5

Memory Bandwidth

559.9 GB/s 57.60 GB/s

Memory Bus Width

256 бит 128 бит

ML Performance

FP16 (Half Precision)

🔥 39.32 TFLOPS
No

BF16 (Brain Float)

No No

TF32 (TensorFloat)

No No

Compute Power

FP32 (Single Precision)

🔥 +1,555% 19.66 TFLOPS
1.1878 TFLOPS

FP64 (Double Precision)

🔥 +6,525% 2.458 TFLOPS
0.0371 TFLOPS

CUDA Cores

🔥 +540% 4,096
640

RT Cores

🔥 32
No

Architecture & Compatibility

GPU Architecture

Xe-HPG Maxwell

SM (Streaming Multiprocessor)

No No

PCIe Version

PCIe 4.0 x16 PCIe 3.0 x8

ML Software Support

CUDA Version

No 5.0

Clocks & Performance

Base Clock

🔥 +135% 2,150
915

Boost Clock

🔥 +159% 2,400
928

Memory Clock

🔥 +143% 2,187
900

Power Consumption

Recommended PSU

550 W No

Power Connector

2x 8-pin None

TDP/TGP

225 W
🔥 -67% 75 W

Rendering

Texture Units (TMU)

🔥 +540% 256
40

ROP

🔥 32
No

L2 Cache

🔥 +700% 16 MB
2 MB

Additional

Slots

Dual-slot IGP

Release Date

Oct. 12, 2022 March 13, 2015

Display Outputs

1x HDMI 2.1
3x DisplayPort 2.0
Portable Device Dependent

Renting is cheaper than buying