AMD Radeon Instinct MI325X vs AMD Radeon Pro W5500M

Comparison AMD Radeon Instinct MI325X with 288 GB HBM3e and 19,456 cores vs AMD Radeon Pro W5500M with 4 GB GDDR6 and 1,408 cores.

Loading...

Performance Rating

AMD Radeon Instinct MI325X outperforms AMD Radeon Pro W5500M by 2,903.0% in the overall GPU ARK performance rating

A100 A100
H200 H200
MI325X MI325X

AMD Radeon Instinct MI325X

100.0

AMD Radeon Instinct MI325X

100.0
RX 7900 XTX RX 7900 XTX
MI250 MI250
Instinct MI300X Instinct MI300X

AMD Radeon Pro W5500M

3.3

AMD Radeon Pro W5500M

3.3

Expert Comparison

AMD Radeon Instinct MI325X значительно превосходит AMD Radeon Pro W5500M по многим параметрам: количество ядер (19456 против 1408), объем памяти (288 ГБ HBM3e против 4 ГБ GDDR6), пропускная способность (10.3 TB/s против 224.0 GB/s) и общую производительность (GPI 100.0 против 3.3). MI325X лучше подходит для вычислительных задач, машинного обучения и высокопроизводительных вычислений, тогда как W5500M более подходящ для профессиональной графики и задач средней сложности.

Contents:

Memory ML Performance Compute Power Architecture & Compatibility ML Software Support Clocks & Performance Power Consumption Rendering Benchmarks Additional

Memory

Memory Size

🔥 +7,100% 288 ГБ
4 GB

Memory Type

HBM3e GDDR6

Memory Bandwidth

🔥 10.3 TB/s
224.0 GB/s

Memory Bus Width

8,192 бит 128 бит

ML Performance

FP16 (Half Precision)

🔥 +6,956% 653.7 TFLOPS
9.265 TFLOPS

BF16 (Brain Float)

No No

TF32 (TensorFloat)

No No

Compute Power

FP32 (Single Precision)

🔥 +1,664% 81.72 TFLOPS
4.632 TFLOPS

FP64 (Double Precision)

🔥 +28,128% 81.72 TFLOPS
0.2895 TFLOPS

CUDA Cores

🔥 +1,282% 19,456
1,408

RT Cores

No No

Architecture & Compatibility

GPU Architecture

CDNA 3.0 RDNA 1.0

SM (Streaming Multiprocessor)

No No

PCIe Version

PCIe 5.0 x16 PCIe 4.0 x8

ML Software Support

CUDA Version

No No

CUDA Toolkit status

Supported Supported

Clocks & Performance

Base Clock

1,000
🔥 +45% 1,448

Boost Clock

🔥 +28% 2,100
1,645

Memory Clock

🔥 +44% 2,525
1,750

Power Consumption

Recommended PSU

1400 W No

Power Connector

None None

TDP/TGP

1000 W
🔥 -92% 85 W

Rendering

Texture Units (TMU)

🔥 +1,282% 1,216
88

ROP

No No

L2 Cache

16 MB
🔥 2 MB

Benchmarks

MLPerf, llama2-70b-99.9 (Dummy)

3 596 tokens/s

MLPerf, llama2-70b-99.9 (fp8)

1 946 tokens/s

llama.cpp, llama-2-7b-Q4_0

22.4 tokens/s

MLPerf, mixtral-8x7b (fp8)

6 975 tokens/s

Additional

Slots

OAM Module No

Release Date

Oct. 12, 2024 Feb. 10, 2020

Display Outputs

No outputs
Portable Device Dependent

Renting is cheaper than buying